2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dissipation BVD schemes for single and multi-phase compressible flows on unstructured grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It needs to be highlighted that the results have been non-dimensionalised with respect to the diameter of the bubble at the time that the shock hits the bubble [44,51,72]. The time intervals that have been used to average the velocities are [10,52] µs for the upstrean interface, [140, 240] µs for the jet, and [140, 240] µs for the downstream interface. It can be noticed that all the obtained predictions are within the variations of the experiment, and in close agreement with the computational results of [13] The results obtained in terms of the averaged velocities of the jet, upstream and downstream interface are in good agreement with the experimental results of Haas and Sturtevant [27], and the computational results of Coralic and Colonius [13] as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Helium Bubble Shock Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It needs to be highlighted that the results have been non-dimensionalised with respect to the diameter of the bubble at the time that the shock hits the bubble [44,51,72]. The time intervals that have been used to average the velocities are [10,52] µs for the upstrean interface, [140, 240] µs for the jet, and [140, 240] µs for the downstream interface. It can be noticed that all the obtained predictions are within the variations of the experiment, and in close agreement with the computational results of [13] The results obtained in terms of the averaged velocities of the jet, upstream and downstream interface are in good agreement with the experimental results of Haas and Sturtevant [27], and the computational results of Coralic and Colonius [13] as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Helium Bubble Shock Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…THINC scheme was developed for capturing moving interfaces or free boundaries in multiphase flows [29,30,47,48,31]. Thanks to its monotonicity and capability to mimic the step-like profile, the THINC reconstruction is also well suited for computing compressible flows including discontinuous solutions with appealing stability and high resolution [22,23,25,24,26,27]. In the THINC scheme, the physical quantity q is reconstructed by a hyperbolic tangent function as…”
Section: Candidate Interpolant 2: Thinc Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the observation that the dissipation term in the approximate Riemann solvers can be effectively reduced by minimizing the difference between the reconstructed left-and right-side values at cell boundaries (referred to as BV (boundary variation)), a new class of reconstruction schemes so-called BVD (Boundary Variation Diminishing) schemes have been proposed in [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The first BVD scheme [18], so-called WENO-THINC-BVD scheme, switches the reconstruction function to WENO scheme for smooth solutions and THINC (Tangent of Hyperbola for INterface Capturing) for discontinuous solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, an accurate and robust Mach-uniform numerical model on unstructured grids was proposed with BVD treatment by Xie et al [18]. Low-dissipation methods based on the BVD idea are presented by Deng et al [37] and Chen et al [45] using the second-order monotonic upstream-centered scheme for conservation laws (MUSCL), the tangent of hyperbola for interface capturing (THINC) scheme, and the variant of THINC [46] scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%