2015
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/06710159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dimensional surgery and the Yamabe invariant

Abstract: Assume that M is a compact n-dimensional manifold and that N is obtained by surgery along a k-dimensional sphere, k ≤ n − 3. The smooth Yamabe invariants σ(M ) and σ(N ) satisfy σ(N ) ≥ min(σ(M ), Λ) for a constant Λ > 0 depending only on n and k. We derive explicit lower bounds for Λ in dimensions where previous methods failed, namely for (n, k) ∈

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Λ spin m,m−3 }. From Theorem 3.1, Section 11, and results in [6] and [7] we obtain explicit positive lower bounds for Λ spin m , summarized in Table 1 for low dimensions. Using standard techniques from bordism theory (see Section 12 for details) one obtains several conclusions: A similar bound also exists for non-simply connected manifolds, namely in this case for m = 9, 10…”
Section: Labelmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, Λ spin m,m−3 }. From Theorem 3.1, Section 11, and results in [6] and [7] we obtain explicit positive lower bounds for Λ spin m , summarized in Table 1 for low dimensions. Using standard techniques from bordism theory (see Section 12 for details) one obtains several conclusions: A similar bound also exists for non-simply connected manifolds, namely in this case for m = 9, 10…”
Section: Labelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Proof. We start analogously as in the spin case from above with a nonnegative solution v ∈ L ∞ ∩ L 2 ∩ C 2 of Lv = µv p−1 on M m,k 1 and use the conformal map u in (7) to obtainṽ on S m \ S k . Analogous as in the proof of Lemma 7.4 we see that Uε(S k ) gives rise to a nonnegative solutionṽ on S m .…”
Section: Cut-off Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where M(M ) denotes the set of smooth Riemannian metrics on M . It is a very difficult problem to explicitly compute, or even give estimates for the Yamabe invariant, especially when it is positive (see for example Section 1.2 in [9], or [21], for reviews of the known results about the Yamabe invariant). In an upcoming work [6], we address to the question of obtaining a positive lower bound for the Yamabe invariant, given by the Yamabe constant of a singular Einstein metric with a edgecone singularity of codimension two and cone angle smaller than 2π.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%