2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2012.6386202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dimensional projections for SyCLoP

Abstract: This paper presents an extension to SyCLoP, a multilayered motion planning framework that has been shown to successfully solve high-dimensional problems with differential constraints. SyCLoP combines traditional sampling-based planning with a high-level decomposition of the workspace through which it attempts to guide a low-level tree of motions. We investigate a generalization of SyCLoP in which the highlevel decomposition is defined over a given low-dimensional projected subspace of the state space. We begin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the experiments use a nonlinear ground vehicle model, a high-dimensional nonlinear second-order snake-like robot model, and a nonlinear second-order aerial-vehicle model operating in complex environments. Statistical analysis is conducted to measure the performance of GUST and compare it to related work, e.g., Syclop [32], VSyclop 1 [46], KPIECE [29], PDST [28], RRT [23], fRRT [30], TRRT [27], and STRIDE [31]. Statistical analysis is also conducted to measure the impact of the decomposition.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the experiments use a nonlinear ground vehicle model, a high-dimensional nonlinear second-order snake-like robot model, and a nonlinear second-order aerial-vehicle model operating in complex environments. Statistical analysis is conducted to measure the performance of GUST and compare it to related work, e.g., Syclop [32], VSyclop 1 [46], KPIECE [29], PDST [28], RRT [23], fRRT [30], TRRT [27], and STRIDE [31]. Statistical analysis is also conducted to measure the impact of the decomposition.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GUST is compared with Syclop [32], VSyclop [46], KPIECE [29], PDST [28], RRT [23], fRRT [30], TRRT [27], STRIDE [31], and also with the preliminary version of GUST [43]. The implementation of Syclop and VSyclop includes several features such as switching between shortest-path and random guides and abandoning the current guide when little progress is made.…”
Section: B Motion Planners Used In the Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%