2013
DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2013.765032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low diagnostic and predictive value of anti-dsDNA antibodies in unselected patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms: results from a long-term follow-up Scandinavian multicentre study

Abstract: CLIFT was not reliable as a diagnostic tool in unselected patients with rheumatic symptoms. ANAs were of little value as a screening test before the CLIFT analysis. CLIFT had surprisingly low positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of SLE despite its high specificity. For non-SLE patients, being CLIFT positive poses little risk of developing SLE within 5 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of anti‐dsDNA in ANA‐negative SLE patients has been reported by others . These patients were reported to have more severe complications, including nephritis , dystrophic calcification , or severe autoimmune neutropenia .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The presence of anti‐dsDNA in ANA‐negative SLE patients has been reported by others . These patients were reported to have more severe complications, including nephritis , dystrophic calcification , or severe autoimmune neutropenia .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We previously observed a sensitivity of 81% for anti-chromatin and 96% for anti-dsDNA in the same cohort of SLE patients with nephritis [29]. Other studies reported different sensitivities and specificities for anti-chromatin (ranging from 45–100% and 88–100%, respectively), and for anti-dsDNA assays (ranging from 35–74% and 79–100%, respectively) [2, 3335]. The specificity of anti-histone autoantibodies for SLE is still under debate, and the observed prevalence (<50%) in SLE patients is always lower compared to anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin reactivity [36,37], as we have previously described [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To this end, it is noteworthy that even the CLIFT test, which according to the present results is the anti-dsDNA assay best correlated with a typical nephritic SLE phenotype, had only low diagnostic value in the diagnosis of SLE in this population of patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms. 55 When analysing the ANA-positive subset of the patients, the CLIFT association with clinical phenotypes consisting of proteinuria, haematuria, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, cutaneous vasculitis and alopecia persisted. On the other hand, pleuritis and proteinuria defined the clinical phenotypes associated with any of the anti-dsDNA tests in ANA-negative patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%