2006
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.881720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Density Parity-Check Lattices: Construction and Decoding Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
98
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall now compare these results with the LDPC-based coding schemes that were described in Section I: LDPC-based multi-level coding [19], [29], nonbinary alphabet LDPC coding [18] and LDPC lattice coding [15]. The comparison is summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We shall now compare these results with the LDPC-based coding schemes that were described in Section I: LDPC-based multi-level coding [19], [29], nonbinary alphabet LDPC coding [18] and LDPC lattice coding [15]. The comparison is summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison is summarized in Table I. The table shows the simulation results which are reported for each scheme in the appropriate reference, including codeword length , distance from channel capacity and error performance, measured as either bit error rate (BER), symbol error rate (SER) or normalized error probability (NEP), as defined in [15]. Note that the schemes of [29] and [18] already include an inherent shaping operation, so the simulation results for these schemes already include practical shaping performance.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few constructions with non-binary codes can be found in [2] (including complex constructions for E 8 and Λ 24 ). Furthermore, powerful lattices such those proposed in [5] [6] and [7] are made of nested binary codes, LDPC and Turbo codes respectively. They suffer from the small number of nested codes due to the limited complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%