2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low demand mitigation options for achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Role of reduced food waste and sustainable dietary choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous literature reports [34,66], the environmental and health/nutrition dimensions of SHD are the most represented, predominantly through addressing food waste and dietary quality [32,67]. Although the importance of both dimensions is clear and has been previously highlighted [68][69][70], further indicators within them or beyond are necessary to address SHD through interventions in a comprehensive way. In contrast, the social and economic dimensions are under-represented in the studies included in this review.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In line with previous literature reports [34,66], the environmental and health/nutrition dimensions of SHD are the most represented, predominantly through addressing food waste and dietary quality [32,67]. Although the importance of both dimensions is clear and has been previously highlighted [68][69][70], further indicators within them or beyond are necessary to address SHD through interventions in a comprehensive way. In contrast, the social and economic dimensions are under-represented in the studies included in this review.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In a similar study by Chang et al [39] including more recent studies, the estimated monetary value of improved air quality ranged from 2 to 380 USD/tCO2e, nearly doubling the maximum yield found in Nemet et al [37]. In a review of the co-benefits from food waste reductions and dietary shifts, Some et al [40] conclude that such demand-side strategies have more synergies than trade-offs with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Chatterjee et al [41] reviewed 52 scientific articles concerning the co-benefits from energy efficiency measures in the EU and South Asian countries, finding that such measures could save billions of dollars annually in energy savings in both regions, amounting to annual energy savings worth USD 13 billion in the EU and USD 26 billion in South Asian countries.…”
Section: Meta Studies On Climate-related Co-benefitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, food waste generates significant greenhouse gas emissions when it decomposes in landfills. Therefore, using GF by-products to produce new value-added ingredients will mitigate climate change (SDG 13), while contributing to the preservation of terrestrial ecosystems (SDG 15) [32,33]. Promoting the integration of upcycling practices within food systems holds significant promise for enhancing circularity within the food industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%