2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low cycle fatigue of a directionally solidified nickel-based superalloy: Testing, characterisation and modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystallographic orientation (see Figure 7) was generated by assuming a fibre texture in which all grains have a <100> direction oriented near the z axis-the perpendicular directions being quasi-randomly oriented. This texture corresponds to the typical texture obtained in DS FCC alloys [8,9,14]. The particular Euler angles (using the Bunge convention) used to generate the fibre texture are φ 1 = 20…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The crystallographic orientation (see Figure 7) was generated by assuming a fibre texture in which all grains have a <100> direction oriented near the z axis-the perpendicular directions being quasi-randomly oriented. This texture corresponds to the typical texture obtained in DS FCC alloys [8,9,14]. The particular Euler angles (using the Bunge convention) used to generate the fibre texture are φ 1 = 20…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Their microstructure is characterised by columnar grains, aligned with the principal-stress axis (-z- axis by convention), that grow in the preferred crystallographic orientation <001> [ 8 , 9 ], leading to considerable anisotropy when the loading changes from the solidification direction to the perpendicular one. Different approaches have been used to model the constitutive response of heterogeneous structures of this type, going from transversally isotropic viscoplastic models [ 10 , 11 ], through the use of self-consistent schemes [ 12 , 13 ], to the crystal-plasticity-finite-element method (CPFEM) [ 14 ]. Transversally isotropic models are of interest when the computational cost is an issue, i.e., simulating a full structural component, but present three main drawbacks: (1) the assumption of one plane of isotropy is not true for a small numbers of grains in the cross-section, (2) strain and stress-fields’ concentrations among grains are not replicated and (3) mechanical tests in at least three different directions are needed to fit the constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the S-N data can be fitted by the Coffin-Manson equation under the LCF condition, and the model based on hysteresis loop energy can be predicted lifetime under TMF condition. Kashinga et al 29 investigated the effect of dwell time on the low cycle fatigue of a directionally-solidified Ni-based superalloy using both experimental and computational methods. It was shown that the misorientations between columnar grains resulted in heterogeneous deformation and localized stress concentrations, which became more severe when the loading direction was perpendicular to a solidification direction, showing the shorter lifetime observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 It is worth noticing that the fundamental understanding of deformation of the alloy is intrinsically important in regulating damage mechanisms and accurately assessing CF life. So far, the creep elevated temperature low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and thermo mechanical fatigue (TMF) behaviours of the alloy TMF is basically thermo mechanical fatigue have been considerably explored 4,[8][9][10][11][12][13] ; however, CF interaction behaviour of this alloy is scarce and least explored. 14 Although few studies 14,15 have been directed to explore the CF behaviour of CM 247 DS LC alloy, our understanding of CF damage NOMENCLATURE: Δɛ/2 (%), Total strain amplitude; Δε p /2 (%), Plastic strain amplitude; ε f ′ (−), Fatigue ductility coefficient; c (−), Fatigue ductility exponent; G (MPa), Shear modulus of elasticity; τ OR (MPa), Orowan stress; b (nm), Burger vector; h (nm), Width of the γ-matrix channel; γ (nm), Gamma micromechanisms is far less than required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%