2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma13010076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction Model of 800H Alloy Based on the Total Strain Energy Density Method

Abstract: In this paper, a high-temperature low-cycle fatigue life prediction model, based on the total strain energy density method, was established. Considering the influence of the Masing and non-Masing behavior of materials on life prediction, a new life prediction model was obtained by modifying the existing prediction model. With an 800H alloy of the heat transfer tube of a steam generator as the research object, the high-temperature and low-cycle fatigue test was carried out at two temperatures. The results show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the fatigue life of specimens tested with two different load modes (kinematic and dynamic) required the selection of the correct fatigue parameter. Among many models found in the literature [32,[34][35][36][37], five common energetic models were used:…”
Section: Energetic Description Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the fatigue life of specimens tested with two different load modes (kinematic and dynamic) required the selection of the correct fatigue parameter. Among many models found in the literature [32,[34][35][36][37], five common energetic models were used:…”
Section: Energetic Description Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jhansale and Topper (1971) 10 proposed the method of master curve construction by translating the hysteresis loops (Figure 3A). Ellyin and Kujawski 6 extended the master curve approach 10 and proposed a relationship 6 to calculate the CPSED for non‐Masing (Type‐I) behavior of the material as follows: Witalicnm()Igoodbreak=()1goodbreak−n*1+n*()normalΔσgoodbreak−δσ0normalΔεpgoodbreak+δσ0normalΔεp where n* is the strain hardening exponent of the master curve and normalδσ0 is the change in proportional stress limit of stable hysteresis loops at half‐life 137 . The change in loop shape or the non‐Masing behavior is taken into account by measuring the extra energy absorbed by the material compared with its Masing behavior.…”
Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n à is the strain hardening exponent of the master curve and δσ 0 is the change in proportional stress limit of stable hysteresis loops at half-life. 137 The change in loop shape or the non-Masing behavior is taken into account by measuring the extra energy absorbed by the material compared with its Masing behavior. Conventionally, the measurement of the extra energy is accomplished by measuring the change in the linear elastic portion of the hysteresis loops with strain amplitude.…”
Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non-masing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models for fatigue life prediction of composite materials are proposed in literature [46][47][48][49][50]. The fatigue life model used in this study is the Epaarachchi model (Eq.…”
Section: Wöhler Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%