2018
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2018.1512105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Cost Image Processing of Bunsen Flame Photography for Estimation of Flame Speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flame edges of the left or right half were detected (Figure e) and then fitted to a curve (Figure f) with MATLAB. Curve fitting was performed on the flame edge, and the resultant curve formula was integrated (eq ) to obtain A b . Here, α < x < β, f ( x ) is the fitted curve equation, and f 1 ( x ) is its first derivative. In the experiment, the left and right halves of the flame were processed separately to calculate S u 0 , and then the average value was calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The flame edges of the left or right half were detected (Figure e) and then fitted to a curve (Figure f) with MATLAB. Curve fitting was performed on the flame edge, and the resultant curve formula was integrated (eq ) to obtain A b . Here, α < x < β, f ( x ) is the fitted curve equation, and f 1 ( x ) is its first derivative. In the experiment, the left and right halves of the flame were processed separately to calculate S u 0 , and then the average value was calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conical flame is not a conical structure in a strict sense as a result of the bending of heat loss in the flame bottom and strong strain at the top. These factors results in that the error between experimental S u 0 and the real data may be up to 20% . In the definition of 1D flame, the area of unburned reactant is used to calculate S u 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each fuel-air mixture sample was quantified, based on the following calibration procedure. Initially, for a Φ range from 0 to 2 with step 0.2, known amounts of mass fuel and air were inserted into the main duct, monitored via high total accuracy calibrated sonic nozzles (± 0.5%) and with digital pressure regulators (Omega® DPG2001B, ± 0.25%), as in [157].…”
Section: Isothermal Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%