2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Cost Automatic Slope Monitoring Using Vector Tracking Analyses on Live-Streamed Time-Lapse Imagery

Abstract: Identifying precursor events that allow the timely forecasting of landslides, thereby enabling risk reduction, is inherently difficult. Here we present a novel, low cost, flow visualization technique using time-lapsed imagery (TLI) that allows real time analysis of slope movement. This approach is applied to the Rest and Be Thankful slope, Argyle, Scotland, where past debris flows have blocked the A83 or forced preemptive closure. TLI of the Rest and Be Thankful are taken from a fixed station, 28 mm lens, time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…True landslides will be missed in two main situations: either their movement is too slow or too intermittent to be detected by a feature tracking‐derived median velocity map or rapid displacement and/or other surface change caused rapid surface decorrelation. Landslides with velocities too low for detection using feature tracking might be identifiable using alternative methods such as InSAR (Ferrigno et al, 2017; Wasowski & Bovenga, 2014) or ground‐based monitoring (Khan et al, 2021). This workflow may work less well in areas of the globe with conditions commonly leading to decorrelation, most commonly due to persistent snow cover, but this is likely to be the case with any optical feature‐tracking workflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True landslides will be missed in two main situations: either their movement is too slow or too intermittent to be detected by a feature tracking‐derived median velocity map or rapid displacement and/or other surface change caused rapid surface decorrelation. Landslides with velocities too low for detection using feature tracking might be identifiable using alternative methods such as InSAR (Ferrigno et al, 2017; Wasowski & Bovenga, 2014) or ground‐based monitoring (Khan et al, 2021). This workflow may work less well in areas of the globe with conditions commonly leading to decorrelation, most commonly due to persistent snow cover, but this is likely to be the case with any optical feature‐tracking workflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, five cases including the standard case, Case 2a with reduced c, Case 2b with reduced 𝜙, Case 3d with a shallower initial water table and Case 4 with 2-hour antecedent rainfall have similar values of δ FS as their ΔFS curves are almost parallel to each other. In this regard, it is a reliable way to use the δ FS to identify the high-hazard areas and could for instance be used to increase the frequency of slope movement monitoring at key sites (Khan et al 2021).…”
Section: Effect Of Soil Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformed image is then segmented by threshold value, and the road main body is extracted after the small area spot is removed and the adaptive structural element morphology closing operation. In [15], [16]. it has been proved that there has been much research on slope monitoring and picture digitization technologies.…”
Section: ░ 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%