2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low complexity template-based watermarking with neural networks and various embedding templates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the output imperceptibility was around 44 dB. Dzhanashia and Evsutin [30] proposed a low-complex template-based robust watermarking technique that utilized the neural networks during the extraction process. The scheme introduced a variable embedding strength α to control the imperceptibility against various attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, the output imperceptibility was around 44 dB. Dzhanashia and Evsutin [30] proposed a low-complex template-based robust watermarking technique that utilized the neural networks during the extraction process. The scheme introduced a variable embedding strength α to control the imperceptibility against various attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid the performance of robust image watermarking, modern classifiers were, recently, tested. This includes models like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [14], Support Vector Machines (SVM) [15], Random Forest (RF) [16], and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and deep learning approaches [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Detailed survey on these classifiers has shown that: a) PSO exhibited relatively high robustness with poor performance against cropping and JPEG compression; b) SVM experienced complications especially when choosing the proper kernel, and when applying the finetune parameter regularization; c) RF has revealed difficulties when training untested data with increasing complexity raised at increased data size, and, d) ANN exhibited better performance over PSO, SVM and RF, since it can be easily learned, even with complex patterns and large dataset sizes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%