2021
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.3046473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Rate- and Channel-Configurable Concatenated Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When concatenated with an outer HD decoder, the role of the inner SD decoder is simply to reduce the BER so the outer decoder can achieve a BER requirement specified by systems. It has been demonstrated in [2]- [6] that, for this role, twolevel multi level codes (MLCs) [7], [8] that encode only the least reliable bit (LRB) of a mapper input by an inner FEC code achieve better performance-complexity trade-offs than the conventional bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) [9], [10] that protects all the bit levels equally by an inner code. Recently, similar two-level coded modulation approach has been also proposed in [11], [12] for four-dimensional lattices, termed Hurwitz constellations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When concatenated with an outer HD decoder, the role of the inner SD decoder is simply to reduce the BER so the outer decoder can achieve a BER requirement specified by systems. It has been demonstrated in [2]- [6] that, for this role, twolevel multi level codes (MLCs) [7], [8] that encode only the least reliable bit (LRB) of a mapper input by an inner FEC code achieve better performance-complexity trade-offs than the conventional bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) [9], [10] that protects all the bit levels equally by an inner code. Recently, similar two-level coded modulation approach has been also proposed in [11], [12] for four-dimensional lattices, termed Hurwitz constellations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%