2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-015-0132-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Non-Uniform Penalized Affine Projection Algorithm for Sparse System Identification

Abstract: In this paper, an improved sparse-aware affine projection (AP) algorithm for sparse system identification is proposed and investigated. The proposed sparse AP algorithm is realized by integrating a non-uniform norm constraint into the cost function of the conventional AP algorithm, which can provide a zero attracting on the filter coefficients according to the value of each filter coefficient. Low complexity is obtained by using a linear function instead of the reweighting term in the modified AP algorithm to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We construct several experiments to look into the estimation behavior of our ZAJO-NLMS and RZAJO-NLMS algorithms through a multi-path wireless communication channel, which is a general sparse channel model obtained from the measurement [14,17] and which has been widely used for verifying the estimation performance of NLMS-based channel estimations [6,7,9,12,14,24,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Moreover, the channel estimation behavior is evaluated using mean-square error, and the channel estimation performance is also compared with the traditional LMS, NLMS, ZA-LMS, RZA-LMS, ZA-NLMS and RZA-NLMS algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We construct several experiments to look into the estimation behavior of our ZAJO-NLMS and RZAJO-NLMS algorithms through a multi-path wireless communication channel, which is a general sparse channel model obtained from the measurement [14,17] and which has been widely used for verifying the estimation performance of NLMS-based channel estimations [6,7,9,12,14,24,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Moreover, the channel estimation behavior is evaluated using mean-square error, and the channel estimation performance is also compared with the traditional LMS, NLMS, ZA-LMS, RZA-LMS, ZA-NLMS and RZA-NLMS algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the zero attracting techniques have been widely researched, and a great quantity of sparse LMS algorithms was exploited by using different norm constraints, such as l p -norm and smooth approximation l 0 -norm constraints [28][29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, the zero attracting (ZA) technique has also been expanded into the affine projection algorithm and the normalized NLMS algorithms to further exploit the applications of the ZA algorithms [12,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], which includes ZA-NLMS and RZA-NLMS algorithms. However, the affine projection algorithm has higher complexity than the NLMS algorithm, which limited its applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, most of the adaptive filter algorithms are mainly presented for non-sparse systems and Gaussian noise environment. To estimate the sparse channels, a lot of adaptive filter algorithms were reported [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] to estimate sparse channels. Least mean square (LMS) algorithm [7] has attracted much attention owing to its simple and low computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%