2018
DOI: 10.3390/jlpea8040046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Loeffler DCT Approximations for Image and Video Coding

Abstract: This paper introduced a matrix parametrization method based on the Loeffler discrete cosine transform (DCT) algorithm. As a result, a new class of 8-point DCT approximations was proposed, capable of unifying the mathematical formalism of several 8-point DCT approximations archived in the literature. Pareto-efficient DCT approximations are obtained through multicriteria optimization, where computational complexity, proximity, and coding performance are considered. Efficient approximations and their scaled 16- a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…N can be represented according to the polar decomposition [53, p. 348] consisting of two parts: (i) a low-complexity matrix T N and (ii) a diagonal matrix Σ N that provides orthogonalization or quasi-orthogonalization [39,53]. Such matrices are related according to:…”
Section: In General a Dct-ii Approximation ĉIimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…N can be represented according to the polar decomposition [53, p. 348] consisting of two parts: (i) a low-complexity matrix T N and (ii) a diagonal matrix Σ N that provides orthogonalization or quasi-orthogonalization [39,53]. Such matrices are related according to:…”
Section: In General a Dct-ii Approximation ĉIimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and • is the matrix square root [53]. Here the operator diag( • ) returns a diagonal matrix with the elements of the diagonal of its matrix argument [39,53].…”
Section: In General a Dct-ii Approximation ĉIimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x 16u = x 8u x 8d (13) x 8u = C 8e Z 8e + C 8o Z 8o = a + b (14) x 8d = C 8e Z 8e − C 8o Z 8o = a − b (15) and…”
Section: Y = Czc Tunclassified
“…In fact, the largest coding unit in HEVC can be up to 64 × 64 in size, and the Transform Unit (TU) sizes can be 4 × 4, 8 × 8, 16 × 16, and 32 × 32 [10]. This multiple TU sizes improve the compression performance but increase the computational complexity to reach a real-time execution [11,12]. In this context, based on the complexity analysis of the HEVC decoder modules for all-intra configuration performed in [13], we can notice that the entropy decoding (ED), the intra prediction (IP) and the DE/IT modules consume on average 38%, 32% and 20% of the total decoding time, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%