2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2017.7946778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low complexity LLR metrics for polar coded QAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After transmission over AWGN channels or Rayleigh fading channels disturbed by AWGN, and assuming equiprobable bits, P (b = 0) = P (b = 1) = 1/2, the Log Likelihood Ratio (LLR) (λ t ) for bit x t is calculated according to [31] as follows…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After transmission over AWGN channels or Rayleigh fading channels disturbed by AWGN, and assuming equiprobable bits, P (b = 0) = P (b = 1) = 1/2, the Log Likelihood Ratio (LLR) (λ t ) for bit x t is calculated according to [31] as follows…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denotes the expected value operator [27]. After transmission over AWGN channels or Rayleigh fading channels disturbed by AWGN, and assuming equiprobable bits, P (b = 0) = P (b = 1) = 1/2, the Log Likelihood Ratio (λ t ) for bit x t is calculated according to [28] as follows…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the length of polar codes exceeds SC decoding's capabilities and channel capacity. SC decoding is also inadequate regarding its ability to correct errors when used for short to intermediate code lengths [8]. While SCL enhances the error correction performance of SC for polar codes, it has a higher computational complexity and poorer output performance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%