2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2019.2914445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Complexity GFDM Receiver for Frequency-Selective Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works focus on the receiver side. [17] and [18] reduce the receiver complexity by employing frequency domain processing. In addition, different techniques have been adopted to achieve low-complexity receiver implementation, such as sparsification and block diagonalization [19], Taylor series and conjugate gradient [20], and tabu search [21].…”
Section: B Low-complexity Transceiver Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works focus on the receiver side. [17] and [18] reduce the receiver complexity by employing frequency domain processing. In addition, different techniques have been adopted to achieve low-complexity receiver implementation, such as sparsification and block diagonalization [19], Taylor series and conjugate gradient [20], and tabu search [21].…”
Section: B Low-complexity Transceiver Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now possible to implement flexible GFDM modems with a complexity similar to the one achieved by conventional OFDM implementations [36]. An efficient Zero-Forcing (ZF) receiver implementation for FSCs is proposed in [37]. These simplifications in the GFDM implementations allows this waveform to be used by B5G networks with insignificant impact on the overall cost of the terminals.…”
Section: A Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the linear detectors, including linear zero forcing (ZF) detector and minimum mean square error (MMSE) reduced the complexity. However, the specific realization of the channel has a great impact on their detection performance 30 . But the detectors reported so far will perform worse for MIMO‐GFDM approach with precoding methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%