2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2009.4960140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-complexity frequency-domain turbo equalization for single-carrier transmissions over doubly-selective channels

Abstract: Single-carrier transmissions with frequency-domain equalization have gained much interest due to their comparable complexity and performance to OFDM, which conversely suffers from a high peak-to-average power ratio. In this paper, we develop a new frequency-domain block turbo equalizer for single-carrier (SC) transmissions over doubly-selective channels. The main feature of the proposed equalizer is its low complexity, which is only linear in the block length. A comparison between SC and OFDM systems with chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity is O((1 + 6(4 + 1))N log N ) = O(341N ) and the equalizer performance is illustrated by the pentagram marked lines. From the simulation results we can see that when the BER is about 1e −6 the performance of the proposed turbo equalizer is about 0.1dB better than the LDL turbo equalizer [8], 0.3dB better than the subblock turbo equalizer [5] and about 0.4 dB better than the original MMSE turbo equalizer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The complexity is O((1 + 6(4 + 1))N log N ) = O(341N ) and the equalizer performance is illustrated by the pentagram marked lines. From the simulation results we can see that when the BER is about 1e −6 the performance of the proposed turbo equalizer is about 0.1dB better than the LDL turbo equalizer [8], 0.3dB better than the subblock turbo equalizer [5] and about 0.4 dB better than the original MMSE turbo equalizer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1, the average bit error rate (BER) performance of the complexity-reduced frequency LDL turbo equalizers [8], the subblock turbo equalizer [5] and the proposed segmental turbo equalizers versus average receive signal to noise ratio (SNR) are compared. We first consider the medium mobility case where the UE speed is V = 485km/h.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations