2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2015.2512535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Algorithms for Low Rank Clutter Parameters Estimation in Radar Systems

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• the Fixed-Point Estimator (FPE) [44], [45], [46] M FPE , that is obtained iteratively solving a fixed point equation; • the Low Rank clutter Estimator (LRE), [17], addressing a mixed Gaussian/compound Gaussian disturbance model. The covariance estimate can be computed as…”
Section: A Spatial Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• the Fixed-Point Estimator (FPE) [44], [45], [46] M FPE , that is obtained iteratively solving a fixed point equation; • the Low Rank clutter Estimator (LRE), [17], addressing a mixed Gaussian/compound Gaussian disturbance model. The covariance estimate can be computed as…”
Section: A Spatial Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where τ k is the estimated texture of the k-th clutter datum and Σ is the covariance estimate of the speckle obtained through the iterative algorithm proposed in [17].…”
Section: A Spatial Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, when number of samples K is less than the dimension of the data M , Tyler's M -estimator [4] is undefined. To solve this problem, the current approaches consider either regularize the M -estimator by shrinking it towards some given target, such as the identity matrix [6][7][8][9], or constraining the CM to have some structure known in a priori to reduce the numbers of parameters to be estimated [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is hard to solve since both the objective function and the constraint set are nonconvex. Following the lines of [11,12], we derive iterative algorithms to compute these new CTE using the (block) Majorization-Minimization (MM) algorithmic framework [16]. The updates have closed-form expression, thus can be computed efficiently, and monotonically decrease the objective value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%