2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low CO2 emission technologies for iron and steelmaking as well as titania slag production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The GWP values of 2.17 kg CO 2 e/kg steel (sintering) and 2.40 kg CO 2 e/kg steel (pelletising) given in Table 5 for the traditional integrated route using coke are not too different to the values reported by other workers for this route using similar LCA methodology, e.g. Orth et al 21) (2.20 kg CO 2 e/kg steel), Scaife et al 22) (2.16 kg CO 2 e/kg steel) and Pirat 23) (2.0 kg CO 2 e/kg steel). Similarly, the GWP value of 0.51 kg CO 2 e/kg steel given in Table 5 for the mini-mill/EAF route (100 % scrap) is not too different to the value of 0.54 kg CO 2 e/kg steel reported by Sandberg et al 24) for this route.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment Of Steelmaking Processesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The GWP values of 2.17 kg CO 2 e/kg steel (sintering) and 2.40 kg CO 2 e/kg steel (pelletising) given in Table 5 for the traditional integrated route using coke are not too different to the values reported by other workers for this route using similar LCA methodology, e.g. Orth et al 21) (2.20 kg CO 2 e/kg steel), Scaife et al 22) (2.16 kg CO 2 e/kg steel) and Pirat 23) (2.0 kg CO 2 e/kg steel). Similarly, the GWP value of 0.51 kg CO 2 e/kg steel given in Table 5 for the mini-mill/EAF route (100 % scrap) is not too different to the value of 0.54 kg CO 2 e/kg steel reported by Sandberg et al 24) for this route.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment Of Steelmaking Processesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…For achieving a more efficient operation from an energy and economic point of view, various revolutionary technologies are now developed as alternative ironmaking processes such as COREX and FINEX already in commercial operation, Circosmelt and HIsarna 1,2) under development. HIsarna, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Possible reasons for the scatter of the data is speculated to be caused by the difference in hot metal chemistry and also the in-coming hot metal temperature. The chemical composition of the steel likely changes the thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the melts, which have been documented elsewhere.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%