2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-4141(200101)31:1<72::aid-immu72>3.3.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low CD4+ T cell responses to the C-terminal region of the malaria merozoite surface protein-1 may be attributed to processing within distinct MHC class II pathways

Abstract: The C-terminal fragment of merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) of the mouse malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi (AS) stimulates a weak CD4 T cell response when compared to the response to a more structurally simple region of the molecule. The tertiary structure of the C-terminal region of MSP-1 is maintained by five disulfide bonds. A peptide from this region could only be processed and loaded onto newly synthesized MHC class II molecules, whereas a peptide from the structurally simple region was ava… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conformational epitopes created by the correct folding of the MSP1 19 fragment are essential for the induction of functionally relevant inhibitory antibodies [59], yet these epitopes are poorly immunogenic [33], most likely because disulfide bond rich moieties inhibit the protease activity essential for antigen processing [39]. The cellular response to MSP1 19 seems to improve when a denatured recombinant protein is used as immunogen [35]. Several approaches have been used to enhance the immunogenicity of the MSP1 19 fragment that include the conjugation of exogenous T cell epitopes to a MSP1 19 fusion protein [60], the fusion of MSP1 19 to novel protein adjuvants [61], the genetic linkage to hepatitis B virus surface protein [62, 63] or the genetic linkage to promiscuous T cell epitopes [40, 42, 64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conformational epitopes created by the correct folding of the MSP1 19 fragment are essential for the induction of functionally relevant inhibitory antibodies [59], yet these epitopes are poorly immunogenic [33], most likely because disulfide bond rich moieties inhibit the protease activity essential for antigen processing [39]. The cellular response to MSP1 19 seems to improve when a denatured recombinant protein is used as immunogen [35]. Several approaches have been used to enhance the immunogenicity of the MSP1 19 fragment that include the conjugation of exogenous T cell epitopes to a MSP1 19 fusion protein [60], the fusion of MSP1 19 to novel protein adjuvants [61], the genetic linkage to hepatitis B virus surface protein [62, 63] or the genetic linkage to promiscuous T cell epitopes [40, 42, 64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T cell reactivity to MSP1, elicited by natural exposure to malaria parasites, is directed toward epitopes located in the amino terminal portion of the protein [33–35]. The compact tertiary structure of the MSP1 19, which is maintained by several disulfide bridges [22, 36, 37], restricts antigen processing and impairs T cell responses to this fragment [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have determined the pathways used for presentation of multiple epitopes from candidate vaccine antigens 42,43 . We have previously shown that CD4 T‐cell epitopes from other bacterial proteins include representatives of both the classical and recycling pathways, depending on the structural context of the particular epitope 22–24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCs incubated with Plasmodium ‐infected RBCs or DCs taken from infected mice can present parasite peptides to CD4 T cells (33, 46, 51). Our studies (54) with bone marrow‐derived DCs and those of Ludendyk et al .…”
Section: The Effect Of Dc–parasite Interaction On the T‐cell Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both peptides required processing of MSP1 to be presented. However, a response by the T‐cell hybridoma recognizing the peptide in the 19‐kDa fragment was only detectable after 7 h of incubation of the DCs with either the protein or infected erythrocytes, compared to the response of the hybridoma recognizing the peptide in the less complex soluble fragment, which occurred within 2 h. Further analysis showed that processing of the 19‐kDa fragment to produce the peptide required the de novo synthesis of MHC class II, whereas the peptide in the soluble fragment was processed in the recycling pathway (46). Reduction of the disulfide bonds within the 19‐kDa fragment decreased the time required for presentation () and rendered the protein also susceptible to processing in this recycling pathway (46).…”
Section: Plasmodium Antigens and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%