Low-carbon strategies towards 2050: Comparing ex-ante policy evaluation studies and national planning processes in Europe

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels by 80%–95% in 2050 compared to 1990 levels. Various approaches have been developed to secure and evaluate the progress made towards this objective. To gain insights into how EU Member States are aligning to this collective long-term objective, we systematically compare the planning and ex-ante evaluation processes for five EU countries (respectively Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom). The comparative analysis consists of a qualitative comparison of (1) the governance of long-term policy planning and evaluation processes, (2) the national arrangement for quantitative (model-based) ex-ante policy evaluation and (3) the national arrangement for qualitative ex-ante policy evaluation (stakeholder participation). In a second step we conduct a quantitative comparison of national model-based ex-ante evaluation studies to assess the relative differences between the considered routes and the differences across the various countries. Although the five Member States plan policies along the same EU objective, we find a high diversity in how long-term commitments are established, governed and evaluated on the national level. Model-based scenario analyses are commonly used to explore and evaluate the possible national routes towards the EU 2050 objective. However, as these processes mostly concentrate on domestic action, they pay little attention to how domestic policies are affected by, or affecting, other international activities throughout Europe. Hence, current findings suggest that cross-border collaboration and stakeholder participation could further strengthen the analytical understanding of required transformative change in Europe and subsequently lead to a more durable long-term solution over time

Low-carbon energy scenarios 2050 in north-west European countries: Towards a more harmonised approach to achieve the EU targets

“…in Germany (Boie et al, 2016;Hochmeyer and Bohm, 2015;Nagl et al, 2011;Schmid and Knopf, 2012;Scholz et al, 2014), the Netherlands (Benders et al, 2011), France (Ze Ya, 2016), the UK (Brand et al, 2012). Van Sluisveld et al (2017) propose a systemic approach to analyse the European lowcarbon strategies towards 2050, comparing ex-ante policy evaluation studies and national planning processes. They investigate the differences in country strategies by comparing the long-term planning processes of five EU countries (Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK).…”

Impact analysis of COVID-19 pandemic on the future green power sector: A case study in the Netherlands

“…The European Union promised that its emissions could be reduced by 80–95% by 2050, compared to the 1990 level [ 42 , 43 ]. Climate policies in the Netherlands have established similar targets and focused more on short-and medium-term plans.…”

Trend Analysis of Taiwan’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Energy Sector and Its Mitigation Strategies and Promotion Actions

“…In July 2015, the Taiwan's congress passed the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (GGRMA), which aimed at a 50% reduction target by 2050 as compared to GHG emission levels in 2005. Obviously, the GHG reduction goal in Taiwan is lower than other countries, such as the European Union [15], USA [16] and Japan [17]. The Act also implements the reduction of GHG emission by setting regulatory goals in stages on a five-year basis.…”