2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16600.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low bounds for pulsar γ-ray radiation altitudes

Abstract: The observational determination of radiation locations can constrain pulsar radiation models. The γ -B process in a strong magnetic field is one of the fundamental physical processes contributing to pulsar radiation mechanisms. Photons generated near a pulsar surface with sufficient energy will be absorbed in the magnetosphere. Considering aberrational, rotational and general relativistic effects, we calculate the γ -B optical depth for γ -ray photons, and we use the derived optical depth to determine the lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the second Fermi-lat Pulsar Catalog (2pc), settled the long-standing debate on the origin of the gamma rays in the inner or outer parts of the pulsar magnetosphere. The strong magnetic field above the neutron star's polar caps prevents the escape of photons with an energy above ε max due to magnetic pair creation and photon splitting (Baring, 2004;Lee et al, 2010). Close to the stellar surface such processes thus yield steep, super-exponential⁴ cut-offs in the gamma-ray spectra above a few GeV, which have not been observed so far.…”
Section: Observational Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…the second Fermi-lat Pulsar Catalog (2pc), settled the long-standing debate on the origin of the gamma rays in the inner or outer parts of the pulsar magnetosphere. The strong magnetic field above the neutron star's polar caps prevents the escape of photons with an energy above ε max due to magnetic pair creation and photon splitting (Baring, 2004;Lee et al, 2010). Close to the stellar surface such processes thus yield steep, super-exponential⁴ cut-offs in the gamma-ray spectra above a few GeV, which have not been observed so far.…”
Section: Observational Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The polar angle and azimuthal angle in the laboratory polar coordinate are denoted as , φ, while the polar angle and azimuthal angle in the magnetic polar coordinate as θ, ψ. Similar to Lee et al (2010), we use bold italic type to label the vectors; while Figure 1. The coordinate systems for an oblique rotator.…”
Section: Coordinates For the Annular Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we calculate the emissivities projected on to the sky I(θ j , ψ j ) and direction n B (θ j , ψ j ) of the emission spot (θ j , ψ j ) on each open field line of each ring in the magnetic frame. We also take the aberration effect into account, and use the Lorentz transformation matrix to transform the emission direction n B (θ j , ψ j ) to the direction n ν (φ j , ζ j ) in the lab frame (observer frame), where φ j = arctan(n ν,y /n ν,x ) is the emission spot's rotation phase with respect to the pulsar rotation axis, and ζ j = arccos(n ν,z / n ν,x 2 + n ν,y 2 + n ν,z 2 ) is the viewing angle for a distant, non-rotating observer (see details for aberration effect in Lee et al 2010). We also add the phase shift δφ ret = −r n cos(θ μ,j − θ j ), the first order of equation (33) in Gangadhara (2005), caused by the retardation effect to φ j , where r n = r/R LC is the emission radius in units of the light cylinder radius and θ μ,j is the half opening angle of the emission beam at the emission spot (θ j , ψ j ).…”
Section: Geometry Emission Region and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations