Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: Prevalence of Serious Spinal Pathologies and Diagnostic Accuracy of Red Flags

Abstract

Background: Very little evidence is available on the prevalence of serious spinal pathologies and the diagnostic accuracy of red flags in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). This systematic review aims to investigate the prevalence of serious spinal pathologies and the diagnostic accuracy of red flags in patients presenting with low back pain to the ED. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS from inception to January 2019. Two reviewers independently reviewed the references and evaluated methodological quality. Results: We analyzed 22 studies with a total of 41'320 patients. The prevalence of any serious spinal pathology requiring immediate/urgent treatment was 2.5-5.1% in prospective and 0.7-7.4% in retrospective studies (0.0-7.2% for vertebral fractures, 0.0-2.1% for spinal cancer, 0.0-1.9% for infectious disorders, 0.1-1.9% for pathologies with spinal cord/cauda equina compression, 0.0-0.9% for vascular pathologies). Examples of red flags which increased the likelihood for a serious condition were: suspicion and/or history of cancer (spinal cancer); intravenous drug use, indwelling vascular catheter, other infection site (epidural abscess). Conclusion: We found a higher prevalence of serious spinal pathologies in the ED compared to the reported prevalence in primary care settings. As the diagnostic accuracy of most red flags was reported only by a single study, further validation in high quality prospective studies is needed.

Guidance concerning chiropractic practice in response to COVID-19 in the U.S.: A summary of state regulators' web-based information

“…The presence of red ags increases the likelihood that patients may have more urgent or serious conditions, such as fracture, cancer, infection, or vascular complication. 26 One can elicit a history and answers to red ag screening questions via telephone, allowing for triage if red ags are present or reassurance if red ags are absent. Atlas and Deyo cited several reasons to consider in-person evaluation, including the presence of any red ags, the presence of radicular symptoms, persistence of symptoms beyond 2 weeks, or if a patient desires in-person evaluation despite reassurance.…”

Emergency department care for low back pain: Should we adopt recommendations from primary care guidelines?

“…Making a differential diagnosis is crucial in the ED care of low back pain. Physicians will likely encounter a larger proportion of patients with an underlying serious pathology in the ED than in primary care, 12 which, if not rapidly identified, can result in serious consequences. However, the current primary care guidelines 6 do not address diagnostic strategies for rare but life‐threatening conditions seen in EDs, such as abdominal aortic aneurysms, in which pain in the lower back may be a sign of impending rupture 10 .…”

Profile and management of patients with low back pain complaints in a Brazilian Emergency Department: a cross-sectional retrospective study

“…Little is known about those who seek care due to LBP in ED [10][11][12]16 , particularly in developing countries such as Brazil 15 . Understanding the profile and management of patients with LBP presenting to EDs is critically important to determine which aspects of care need to be improved and ensure the delivery of qualified and safe healthcare.…”