Low back pain in hemodialysis patients: Risk factors and its impact on health-related quality of life

Kesikburun, Bilge; Akdağ, İ̇brahim; Çakçı, Aytül

doi:10.5606/tftrd.2018.1016

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(25 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Labor-related variables were employment status (“employer”, “self-employed”, “regular employee”, and “non-regular employee”) [ 22 ], income level (low: <4 million JPY; intermediate: 4–7 million JPY; high: >7 million JPY; and unknown or no answer) [ 20 ], and working time (<35, 35–39, 40–44, or >45 h/week) [ 23 ]. We adjusted for health-related status as follows: smoking status (never, former, and current), alcohol use (never, former, and current), and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, and psychiatric disorders) [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Increased Work from Home and Low Back Pain among Japanese Desk Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Minoura

Ishimaru

Kokaze

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), desk workers in Japan have been encouraged to work from home. Due to rapidly increased working from home, working in environments that are not properly designed and working with poor posture can affect low back pain (LBP). This study aimed to examine the relationship between increased work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and LBP among Japanese desk workers. Using study data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey 2020 conducted from August to September 2020, 4227 desk workers who did not have LBP before the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed out of 25,482 total respondents. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for LBP were calculated by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for covariates such as socioeconomic factors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 31.3% of desk workers with an increased chance of working from home, and 4.1% had LBP. Desk workers with increased working from home were more likely to have LBP (OR: 2.00 (95% CI, 1.36–2.93)). In this large-scale study, increased work from home was associated with LBP among desk workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, preparing an appropriate work environment for desk workers working from home can improve productivity, leading to positive effects.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Increased Work from Home and Low Back Pain among Japanese Desk Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Minoura

Ishimaru

Kokaze

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 6 , 7 The QOL of these patients is associated with socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, level of education, and marital status, 8–10 clinical characteristics such as primary disease, comorbidities, and duration of hemodialysis, 11 , 12 as well as chronic pain factors including the duration of pain, pain severity, pain affect, the location of pain. 5 , 13 , 14 Most importantly, psychosocial factors such as social support, self-efficacy, and depression, can also significantly affect QOL. 15–17 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6,7 The QOL of these patients is associated with socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, level of education, and marital status, [8][9][10] clinical characteristics such as primary disease, comorbidities, and duration of hemodialysis, 11,12 as well as chronic pain factors including the duration of pain, pain severity, pain affect, the location of pain. 5,13,14 Most importantly, psychosocial factors such as social support, self-efficacy, and depression, can also significantly affect QOL. [15][16][17] Social support is defined as the interpersonal transaction involving one or more of the following: (1) emotional concern (liking, love, empathy), (2) instrumental aid (goods or services), ( 3) information (about the environment), or (4) appraisal (information relevant to self-evaluation).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chronic Pain and Quality of Life in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in China: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study

Rao¹,

Zeng²,

Wang³

et al. 2022

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) frequently experience chronic pain, which can severely affect their quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chronic pain in MHD patients and examine the factors associated with QOL. Patients and Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted between October 2020 and April 2021, 1204 MHD patients from nine hemodialysis units were screened for chronic pain in Chengdu, China, and 296 MHD patients with chronic pain were enrolled in this study. We analyzed data on clinicodemographic characteristics, pain interference and severity (Brief Pain Inventory), QOL (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey - mental component summary [MCS] and physical component summary [PCS]), pain self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), and social support (Social Support Rating Scale). Results The prevalence of chronic pain in MHD patients was 26.74% in this study. The most common areas of pain were lower back (63.5%), lower limbs (55.0%), and head (33.5%), 36.5% did not implement any measures to relieve it. Of the patients who did receive pain treatment or medication, 56.9% reported that the measures they took had less than half of the pain relief. MHD patients with chronic pain had poor QOL based on scores on the MCS (53 ± 16.76) and PCS (40.56 ± 13.81). Stepwise multiple regression identified age, financial strain, pain interference, social support, and pain self-efficacy as independent predictors of QOL. Pain self-efficacy was significantly associated with social support ( r = 0.5, p < 0.01), MCS ( r = 0.69, p < 0.01), and PCS ( r = 0.8, p < 0.01). The mediating effects of pain self-efficacy were 70.31% on the relationship between social support and MCS, and 75.62% on the relationship between social support and PCS. Conclusion Chronic pain is prevalent and undermanaged in Chinese MHD patients, resulting in worse QOL. Healthcare providers should focus on pain management and the impact of psychosocial factors on patient QOL. Further research should deepen our understanding of how pain self-efficacy mediates the relationship between social support and QOL.

show abstract

“…Another study of Bilge K was reported 36.7% patients had bodyache. 29 The reason might be due to poor health associated quality of life in patients taking hemodialysis treatment.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Renal bone disease in patients on hemodialysis: an observational study focusing on the variation of calcium metabolism

Elahi¹,

Syed²,

Jamil³

et al. 2019

Int J Res Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the disturbances in the levels of mineral in the body due to hemodialysis at different levels of parathormone levels and to assess its association with the calcium levels.Methods: Study was a cross sectional for the period of 6 months taking ethical approval. Total 255 cases were registered in this study after taking their informed consent. The cases were divided into three groups according to PTH level. Group 1 has 87 subjects with PTH level <250, group 2 has 102 subjects with PTH level 250-650 and group 3 has 66 cases with PTH level >650. The cases were taking hemodialysis for greater than 6 months and have the ages more than 18 years were included in this study. The demographic data includes age, sex dialysis related data like duration of hemodialysis, levels of calcium, phosphorus, albumin, PTH, ALP were observed.Results: Hemodialysis duration were recorded in respective three groups as 7.28±5.71, 6.26±5.56 and 6.15±4.30 days respectively (P=0.319). Calcium was found in group 1, 8.70±0.81, in group 2, 8.39±0.89 and in group 3, 8.76±0.82 (P=0.01). PTH level in three respective group were recorded to be 123.46±74.15, 418.47±115.49 and 1314.67±1188.63 (P <0.001).Conclusions: Present study showed that significant difference was found in mineral levels in patients on hemodialysis with PTH level as well as with alkaline phosphatase level. Nevertheless, no significant difference was found with duration of dialysis and with parameter of albumin.

show abstract

Low back pain in hemodialysis patients: Risk factors and its impact on health-related quality of life

Cited by 9 publications

References 23 publications

Increased Work from Home and Low Back Pain among Japanese Desk Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Increased Work from Home and Low Back Pain among Japanese Desk Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Chronic Pain and Quality of Life in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in China: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study

Renal bone disease in patients on hemodialysis: an observational study focusing on the variation of calcium metabolism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About