Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the current patterns of service delivery of Canadian physiotherapy (PT) professionals working in adult musculoskeletal (MSK) outpatient practice. Methods: A total of 846 Canadian PT professionals working with an adult MSK outpatient clientele participated in an online survey about how they would treat a patient with low back pain (LBP). After reading an online clinical vignette about a fictional patient with varying insurance status, participants answered question… Show more
“…In another vignette-based survey study of current PT practice patterns in LBP management, the authors identified that Canadian physiotherapists preferred to treat LBP patients two to three times per week, for 30 to 60 min per session, over a time period of one to three months [ 36 ]. These findings of Orozco and colleagues [ 36 ] are consistent with answers to the dose selection process of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another vignette-based survey study of current PT practice patterns in LBP management, the authors identified that Canadian physiotherapists preferred to treat LBP patients two to three times per week, for 30 to 60 min per session, over a time period of one to three months [ 36 ]. These findings of Orozco and colleagues [ 36 ] are consistent with answers to the dose selection process of our study. In comparison, a survey study conducted in New Zealand revealed that physiotherapists regularly provided between six to ten treatment sessions for NSCLBP patients and highlighted that this scope of therapy is not sufficient to support patients in self-managing their chronic conditions [ 37 ].…”
Background
In Germany, exercise therapy represents the most commonly prescribed physiotherapy service for non-specific, chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). So far, little is known about current practice patterns of German physiotherapists in delivering this intervention. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of exercise therapy delivered to NSCLBP patients in German physiotherapy care and to identify practitioner-related drivers of appropriate exercise delivery.
Methods
We used a vignette-based, exploratory, cross-sectional, online-survey study design (76-items; data collection between May and July 2023). Eligible participants were required to hold a professional degree in physiotherapy and were required to be practicing in Germany. Access links to anonymous online surveys were spread via established German physiotherapy networks, educational platforms, social media, e-mail lists, and snowball sampling. Appropriateness of exercise therapy was calculated by an equally weighted total score (400 points) including scales on shared-decision-making, exercise dose selection, pain knowledge and self-management promotion. “Appropriate exercise delivery” was determined by a relative total score achievement of > 80%. “Partly appropriate exercise delivery” was determined by a relative total score achievement of 50–79%, and “inappropriate exercise delivery” by a score achievement of < 50%. Practitioner-related drivers of exercise appropriateness were calculated by bivariate and multiple linear regression analyses.
Results
11.9% (N = 35) of 298 physiotherapists’ exercise delivery was considered “appropriate”, 83.3% (N = 245) was “partly appropriate”, and 4.8% (N = 14) was “inappropriate”. In the final multiple regression model, most robust parameters positively influencing appropriate delivery of exercise therapy were increased scientific literacy (B = 10.540; 95% CI [0.837; 20.243]), increased average clinical assessment time (B = 0.461; 95% CI [0.134; 0.789]), increased self-perceived treatment competence (B = 7.180; 95% CI [3.058; 11.302], and short work experience (B = − 0.520; 95% CI [-0.959; − 0.081]).
Conclusion
Appropriate exercise delivery in NSCLBP management was achieved by only 11.9% of respondents. However, the vast majority of 95.2% of respondents was classified to deliver exercise therapy partly appropriate. Long work experience seemed to negatively affect appropriate exercise delivery. Positive influences were attributed to scientific literacy, the average clinical assessment time per patient as well as the perceived treatment competence in NSCLBP management.
Registration
Open science framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S76MF.
“…In another vignette-based survey study of current PT practice patterns in LBP management, the authors identified that Canadian physiotherapists preferred to treat LBP patients two to three times per week, for 30 to 60 min per session, over a time period of one to three months [ 36 ]. These findings of Orozco and colleagues [ 36 ] are consistent with answers to the dose selection process of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another vignette-based survey study of current PT practice patterns in LBP management, the authors identified that Canadian physiotherapists preferred to treat LBP patients two to three times per week, for 30 to 60 min per session, over a time period of one to three months [ 36 ]. These findings of Orozco and colleagues [ 36 ] are consistent with answers to the dose selection process of our study. In comparison, a survey study conducted in New Zealand revealed that physiotherapists regularly provided between six to ten treatment sessions for NSCLBP patients and highlighted that this scope of therapy is not sufficient to support patients in self-managing their chronic conditions [ 37 ].…”
Background
In Germany, exercise therapy represents the most commonly prescribed physiotherapy service for non-specific, chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). So far, little is known about current practice patterns of German physiotherapists in delivering this intervention. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of exercise therapy delivered to NSCLBP patients in German physiotherapy care and to identify practitioner-related drivers of appropriate exercise delivery.
Methods
We used a vignette-based, exploratory, cross-sectional, online-survey study design (76-items; data collection between May and July 2023). Eligible participants were required to hold a professional degree in physiotherapy and were required to be practicing in Germany. Access links to anonymous online surveys were spread via established German physiotherapy networks, educational platforms, social media, e-mail lists, and snowball sampling. Appropriateness of exercise therapy was calculated by an equally weighted total score (400 points) including scales on shared-decision-making, exercise dose selection, pain knowledge and self-management promotion. “Appropriate exercise delivery” was determined by a relative total score achievement of > 80%. “Partly appropriate exercise delivery” was determined by a relative total score achievement of 50–79%, and “inappropriate exercise delivery” by a score achievement of < 50%. Practitioner-related drivers of exercise appropriateness were calculated by bivariate and multiple linear regression analyses.
Results
11.9% (N = 35) of 298 physiotherapists’ exercise delivery was considered “appropriate”, 83.3% (N = 245) was “partly appropriate”, and 4.8% (N = 14) was “inappropriate”. In the final multiple regression model, most robust parameters positively influencing appropriate delivery of exercise therapy were increased scientific literacy (B = 10.540; 95% CI [0.837; 20.243]), increased average clinical assessment time (B = 0.461; 95% CI [0.134; 0.789]), increased self-perceived treatment competence (B = 7.180; 95% CI [3.058; 11.302], and short work experience (B = − 0.520; 95% CI [-0.959; − 0.081]).
Conclusion
Appropriate exercise delivery in NSCLBP management was achieved by only 11.9% of respondents. However, the vast majority of 95.2% of respondents was classified to deliver exercise therapy partly appropriate. Long work experience seemed to negatively affect appropriate exercise delivery. Positive influences were attributed to scientific literacy, the average clinical assessment time per patient as well as the perceived treatment competence in NSCLBP management.
Registration
Open science framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S76MF.
“…The study had other secondary objectives, which have been published elsewhere. 56 Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools. 57…”
Section: Recruitment and Survey Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such guidelines should provide evidence-based benchmarks for service provision to ensure that all people receive services according to their clinical needs, moving professionals beyond the implicitly biased practices identified in the survey. 56 The creation of national guidelines would obviously require consensus among key stakeholders, such as third-party payers, professional associations, and government Health Ministry delegates. National guidelines would also need to be enacted within provincial contexts by professional boards and associations, and tangible incentives would likely need to be offered to clinics to ensure participation.…”
There appears to be an implicit professional bias in relation to patients' insurance status; the resulting inequity in service provision highlights the need for further research as a basis for national guidelines to promote equity in access to and provision of quality physical therapy services.
“…While estimates of physical therapy patterns of care are available, these are either not specific to the workers' compensation sector or are from single Australian jurisdictions or outside Australia [13,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, the determinants of seeking physical therapy in compensated workers…”
Objectives
To identify the prevalence and frequency of physiotherapy, chiropractic, and/or osteopathy care in Australians with workers’ compensation claims for low back pain (LBP).
Methods
We included workers with accepted workers’ compensation claims longer than 2 weeks from the Australian states of Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia. Workers were grouped by whether they attended physiotherapy, chiropractic, and/or osteopathy in the first 2 years of their claim. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to describe differences between groups. Descriptive statistics and negative binomial regression were used to describe differences in the number of attendances in each group.
Results
Most workers had at least one physical therapy attendance during the period of their claim (n = 23,619, 82.0%). Worker state, socioeconomic status, and remoteness were the largest contributing factors to likelihood of physical therapy attendance. Most workers only attended physiotherapy (n = 21,035, 89.1%, median of 13 times). Far fewer only attended chiropractic (n = 528, 2.2%, median of 8 times) or only osteopathy (n = 296, 1.3%, median of 10 times), while 1,750 (7.5%) attended for care with more than one type of physical therapy (median of 31 times).
Conclusion
Most Australian workers with workers’ compensation time loss claims for LBP attend physiotherapy at least once during their claims. State of claim is the strongest predictor of which physical therapy profession they attend, possibly due to regional availability. Workers who see a physiotherapist have significantly more attendances. Future research should explore the relationship between these patterns of care and claimant outcomes, including work disability duration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.