2021
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low and high birth weight in a hospital population in Sudan: An analysis of clinical cut‐off values

Abstract: Objective To determine the cut‐off values for low birth weight (LBW) and high birth weight (HBW) of Sudanese newborns. Methods Data (maternal age, parity, birth weight, and gender of the newborn) from women (n = 2818) who delivered at Saad Abualila Hospital in Khartoum were retrieved from the medical files. Results The cut‐off for LBW (the 10th centile) was 2400 g and the 90th centile (HBW) was 3700 g. Out of 2818 newborns, 317 (11.2%) had birth weights below 2400 g. Using the WHO (traditional) cut‐off of 2500… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 12% of deliveries resulted in a LBW infant. The prevalence of LBW in our study is comparable with the LBW prevalence (14.3%) which was previously reported in the same hospital ( 20 ) and in different hospitals in neighboring Ethiopia ( 24 26 ). The prevalence of LBW in our study is lower than the LBW prevalence (21.6%) reported at the Debre Markos Hospital (Ethiopia) ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, 12% of deliveries resulted in a LBW infant. The prevalence of LBW in our study is comparable with the LBW prevalence (14.3%) which was previously reported in the same hospital ( 20 ) and in different hospitals in neighboring Ethiopia ( 24 26 ). The prevalence of LBW in our study is lower than the LBW prevalence (21.6%) reported at the Debre Markos Hospital (Ethiopia) ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A sample size calculation for a cross-sectional study was applied and was estimated as 1,505 women using the recent prevalence (14.5%) of LBW in the study area ( 20 ). Thus, we assumed that the ratio of women with LBW to the women with no LBW was 1:6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation