2017
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myx124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low and constant micafungin concentrations may be sufficient to lead to resistance mutations in FKS2 gene of Candida glabrata

Abstract: We studied the ability of five echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata isolates to acquire in vitro resistance to anidulafungin and micafungin. All isolates became phenotypically resistant after 2-4 days of exposure to low and constant micafungin concentrations (P < .05). Mutations in the HS1 region of the FKS2 gene were found in all isolates. The acquisition of resistance was not related to the previous use of antifungal treatment in the patients or the presence of mutations at MSH2 gene. We found differences (P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among clinical isolates, MSH2 polymorphisms did not correlate with echinocandin resistance in low-resistance settings (20). MSH2 polymorphisms were not evaluated in the present study; however, a prior report did not find a correlation with selection of micafungin resistance and MSH2 genotype (21). In patients, resistance is most commonly encountered following echinocandin exposure, which can serve as a useful Bayesian indicator for clinical decision making before susceptibility test results are available (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Among clinical isolates, MSH2 polymorphisms did not correlate with echinocandin resistance in low-resistance settings (20). MSH2 polymorphisms were not evaluated in the present study; however, a prior report did not find a correlation with selection of micafungin resistance and MSH2 genotype (21). In patients, resistance is most commonly encountered following echinocandin exposure, which can serve as a useful Bayesian indicator for clinical decision making before susceptibility test results are available (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Very recently, Bordallo-Cardona et al . investigated the ability of five echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata isolates to acquire in vitro resistance to anidulafungin and micafungin and, remarkably, all isolates acquired resistance after 2–4 days of exposure to low and constant micafungin concentrations and mutations in FKS2 were found in all of them [88]. This study highlights the idea that the constant exposure to low doses of echinocandins promotes the development of resistance.…”
Section: Candida Evolution Towards Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recent studies indicate that echinocandin resistance rates among C. glabrata clinical isolates have risen worldwide (Kiraz et al, 2010; Bourgeois et al, 2014; Guinea et al, 2014; Orasch et al, 2014; Klotz et al, 2016; Chapman et al, 2017; Hou et al, 2017). Resistance has been reported to easily develop in vitro (Bordallo-Cardona et al, 2017, 2018a,c; Shields et al, 2019) and in patients after echinocandin exposure (Dannaoui et al, 2012; Shields et al, 2012; Alexander et al, 2013; Bizerra et al, 2014; Sasso et al, 2017), being conferred by the presence of point mutations in hot-spot regions of FKS1 and FKS2 genes (Castanheira et al, 2014; Pham et al, 2014) that have been associated with higher MICs and therapeutic failure (Shields et al, 2012). Our study provides a new insight into the development of echinocandin resistance of C. glabrata strains both sequentially isolated from several patients and after in vitro exposure to growing concentrations of micafungin and anidulafungin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FKS mutations have been reported to correlate with elevated in vitro minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and clinical failure (Alexander et al, 2013), yet an explanation for this increase in echinocandin resistant strains has not been proved. Several possibilities are being studied, such as strains proneness to acquire resistance as an answer to echinocandin exposure (Bordallo-Cardona et al, 2017, 2018a,c; Shields et al, 2019), the existence of hidden reservoirs in the human body of echinocandin resistant C. glabrata isolates (Shields et al, 2014; Grau et al, 2015; Jensen et al, 2015; Healey et al, 2017) or molecular mechanisms like MSH2 mutator phenotype (Delliere et al, 2016; Healey et al, 2016b; Byun et al, 2018; Hou et al, 2018; Singh et al, 2018; Bordallo-Cardona et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%