2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
277
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
3
277
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The result with a few samples with a small variation was slightly better than when using the average value as the estimate; this indicated that with the comprehensive machine learning method the estimation accuracy could be improved from the case of using only average values, as it revealed relatively small spatial variations. Although we obtained promising results using datasets from the 140 m or higher flight heights, the use of lower height data, and thus more precise CHMs, can improve the estimations, as shown in previous studies using flight heights of 50 m or less [4,21,25]. We assume that the spatial and radiometric resolution of the images are the fundamental factors impacting the quality of CHM thus we expect that alternatively a better-quality imaging system could also provide good results from higher altitudes; this would be advantageous if aiming at mapping larger areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The result with a few samples with a small variation was slightly better than when using the average value as the estimate; this indicated that with the comprehensive machine learning method the estimation accuracy could be improved from the case of using only average values, as it revealed relatively small spatial variations. Although we obtained promising results using datasets from the 140 m or higher flight heights, the use of lower height data, and thus more precise CHMs, can improve the estimations, as shown in previous studies using flight heights of 50 m or less [4,21,25]. We assume that the spatial and radiometric resolution of the images are the fundamental factors impacting the quality of CHM thus we expect that alternatively a better-quality imaging system could also provide good results from higher altitudes; this would be advantageous if aiming at mapping larger areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Prior to the emergence of remote sensing technology, large AGB surveys were limited by labor and resources [4][5][6]. Hyperspectral technology has shown great potential for monitoring of crop parameters [15,16]. Hyperspectral sensors can obtain spectral features based on radiation from visible to near-infrared wavelengths, and advancements in technology have increased the number of features that can be collected [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to imaging sensors, LIDAR sensors are also used to estimate crop height and volume at high voxel resolutions (Christiansen et al 2017). A comprehensive review of high-resolution aerial phenotyping systems is provided by Sankaran et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%