2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01361.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Altitude Aerial Photography Applications for Digital Surface Models Creation in Archaeology

Abstract: Low Altitude Aerial Photography (LAAP) is based on the use of small flying platforms to take photographs from very low altitudes. The acquisition of series of Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and orthoimages through photogrammetric and orthorectification processes is one of the main applications. The use of this technique in archaeological sites provides very precise and valuable data, but knowing the reliability of the method is a key to ensuring that the results are valid, since the repeatability of the method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous publications discuss specific segments of the UAV-photogrammetry workflow; for example, flight planning and on-site execution (e.g., Field et al 2017; Hamilton and Stephenson 2016; Nex and Remondino 2014) and the accuracy of the models derived from photogrammetric analysis (e.g., Baliño 2016; Dubbini et al 2016; Harwin and Lucieer 2012; Lo Brutto et al 2014; Martínez-del-Pozo et al 2013; Mesas-Carrascosa et al 2016; Nocerino et al 2013; Ortiz et al 2013). While we appreciate these contributions for the precision, detail, and depth they offer to UAV research, as newcomers to drone-based archaeological survey, we were discouraged by the scarcer availability of publications that pragmatically discuss both field protocols and post-processing workflows to produce the two main outputs of UAV-based survey; namely, (1) digital models of topographic surfaces or monuments, and (2) orthophoto mosaics of excavations and landscapes (but see Chiabrando et al 2011; Fernández-Hernandez et al 2015; Turner et al 2012; Wernke et al 2014).…”
Section: Research Context and Background To Uav Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications discuss specific segments of the UAV-photogrammetry workflow; for example, flight planning and on-site execution (e.g., Field et al 2017; Hamilton and Stephenson 2016; Nex and Remondino 2014) and the accuracy of the models derived from photogrammetric analysis (e.g., Baliño 2016; Dubbini et al 2016; Harwin and Lucieer 2012; Lo Brutto et al 2014; Martínez-del-Pozo et al 2013; Mesas-Carrascosa et al 2016; Nocerino et al 2013; Ortiz et al 2013). While we appreciate these contributions for the precision, detail, and depth they offer to UAV research, as newcomers to drone-based archaeological survey, we were discouraged by the scarcer availability of publications that pragmatically discuss both field protocols and post-processing workflows to produce the two main outputs of UAV-based survey; namely, (1) digital models of topographic surfaces or monuments, and (2) orthophoto mosaics of excavations and landscapes (but see Chiabrando et al 2011; Fernández-Hernandez et al 2015; Turner et al 2012; Wernke et al 2014).…”
Section: Research Context and Background To Uav Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches also consist of outdoor visual identification activities in populated environments using UAVs, which involve low-altitude aerial photography capabilities for capturing photographs from low altitudes. To capture this photography, UAVs utilizes two components: GPS to attain geospatial accuracy and a sensor for data collection [16]. The sensors of these aircrafts utilize infrared sensitive films that can distinguish different types of vegetation, based on the varying spectral reflectance of plant species.…”
Section: Computer Vision Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%