Low Affinity Interaction of Human or Rat T Cell Adhesion Molecule CD2 with Its Ligand Aligns Adhering Membranes to Achieve High Physiological Affinity

Abstract

The mechanism by which low affinity adhesion molecules function to produce stable cell-cell adhesion is unknown. In solution, the interaction of human CD2 with its ligand CD58 is of low affinity (500 mM ؊1 ) and the interaction of rat CD2 with its ligand CD48 is of still lower affinity (40 mM ؊1 ). At the molecular level, however, the two systems are likely to be topologically identical. Fluorescently labeled glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored CD48 and CD58 were prepared and incorporated into supported phospholipid bilayers, in which the ligands were capable of free lateral diffusion. Quantitative fluorescence imaging was used to study the binding of cell surface human and rat CD2 molecules to the fluorescent ligands in contact areas between Jurkat cells and the bilayers. These studies provide two major conclusions. First, CD2/ligand interactions cooperate to align membranes with nanometer precision leading to a physiologically effective two-dimensional affinity. This process does not require the intact cytoplasmic tail of CD2. Second, the degree of membrane alignment that can be achieved by topologically similar receptors deteriorates with decreasing affinity. This suggests an affinity limit for the ability of this mode of cooperativity to achieve stable cell-cell adhesion at approximately 10 mM ؊1 .Many biologically important events are initiated and sustained through low affinity binding interactions in cell-cell and cell-matrix contact areas. Several models suggest that active intracellular mechanisms are engaged to assist these low affinity interactions (1-3). This intracellular regulation can occur through the cytoplasmic domains of the adhesion molecules as in integrins and cadherins (4 -6). Other models hypothesize that the ectodomains of low affinity adhesion molecules can oligomerize to produce stable arrays that enhance the intrinsic affinity of the ectodomain interaction (7-9). Testing of these models has been limited by the absence of quantitative affinity measurements in contact areas. The fluid mosaic membrane can be viewed as a nearly two-dimensional solution in which diffusion is constrained to the plane of the membrane, with a small third dimension arising from the flexible tethering of the membrane anchored adhesion molecules (10). The contact area between two apposing membranes may have additional depth in the third dimension due to fluctuations in the distance between the two membranes. The thesis of this study is that low affinity adhesion interactions can succeed in forming many bonds between cells by organizing the two apposing membranes so that the depth of the third dimension is small and optimal for the relevant adhesion molecule pair. When the third dimension is minimized by this cooperativity, the adhesion molecule concentration is increased and bond formation is strongly favored.In this study, we tested this hypothesis using the human and rat CD2 adhesion systems. CD2 is an adhesion molecule expressed primarily on T lymphocytes in human, rat and other mammalian species. In all sp...

Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule (CDw150) Is Homophilic but Self-associates with Very Low Affinity

“…For murine CD2-CD48 interactions, the two-dimensional affinity barely supports the formation of molecular contacts between cells and model planar membranes when the proteins are at physiological densities (54). It therefore cannot necessarily be concluded that the extracellular domains of proteins with solution dissociation constants higher than 75 µM will spontaneously interact at physiological densities.…”

“…In this complex, CD2 and CD58 each dock at structurally equivalent sites centred on the and II, respectively. The more relevant parameter, however, is the "two-dimensional" affinity which allows comparisons of interactions between proteins confined within adjacent lipid bilayers (53,54).…”

Molecular flexibility can influence the stimulatory ability of receptor–ligand interactions at cell–cell junctions

“…Ever since the seminal work of Bell (8), many authors have considered how receptor-ligand binding in the membrane environment will differ from the same interactions measured in solution (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). All of these studies consider the generic physical effects of confining receptors and ligands to two apposed cell membranes.…”

Quantifying the Impact of Membrane Microtopology on Effective Two-dimensional Affinity

“…Rough cells initially may form isolated point contacts that over time might be broadened and connected through active membrane processes (2). Alternatively, the cells may simply possess inherently smooth surfaces capable of broad initial contacts.…”