Background
Prior evidence for a possible link between vitamin D status and hematologic malignancy (HM) in humans comes from observational studies, leaving unresolved the question of whether a true causal relationship exists.
Methods
We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Calcium/Vitamin D (CaD) Trial, a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) of CaD supplementation compared to placebo in older women. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis methods were used to evaluate the relationship between treatment assignment and (a) incident HM and (b) HM-specific mortality over 10 years following randomization. HMs were classified by cell type (lymphoid, myeloid or plasma cell) and analyzed as distinct endpoints in secondary analyses.
Results
34,763 WHI CaD trial participants (median age = 63 years) had complete baseline covariate data and were eligible for analysis. Women assigned to CaD had a significantly lower risk of incident HM (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.99) but not HM-specific mortality (in entire cohort: HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.53, 1.11; among incident HM cases following diagnosis: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.70, 1.51). In secondary analyses, protective associations were most robust for lymphoid malignancies, with HRs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.01) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.89) for cancer incidence and mortality in those assigned to CaD supplementation.
Conclusions
This post hoc analysis of data from a large and well-executed RCT demonstrates a protective association between modest CaD supplementation and HM risk in older women. Additional research on the relationship between vitamin D and HM is warranted.