1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00116287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Love numbers of the moon and of the terrestrial planets

Abstract: In the IERS Standards (1989), for the Moon the adopted value of the tide Love number, k2, is equal to 0.0222. In this paper using the latest geodetic parameters of the Moon a group of internal structure models are constructed for this celestial body (see Table V), then the dependence of the Moon's core size on calculated value of k2 is explored. The obtained results indicate that the second degree Love number, k2 = 0.02664, of the lunar model 91-04 is near its observed value (0.027 -+ 0.006). This implies that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same trend is expected for inclusion of solid-body effects, which will be important for colder super-Earth planets and those with less extended, less massive atmosphere. Theoretical k 2 values for the terrestrial objects are in good agreement with the observations when making the simplifying assumption of an elastic interior (Zhang 1992;Yoder et al 2003) (in which case the shear modulus becomes frequency-independent, i.e. k 2 a static Love number), while their observed moments of inertia are close to 0.4 indicating a nearly homogeneous interior, the theoretical Love number k 2 of which would approach 1.5 if the body were fluid and compressible.…”
Section: Compositionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same trend is expected for inclusion of solid-body effects, which will be important for colder super-Earth planets and those with less extended, less massive atmosphere. Theoretical k 2 values for the terrestrial objects are in good agreement with the observations when making the simplifying assumption of an elastic interior (Zhang 1992;Yoder et al 2003) (in which case the shear modulus becomes frequency-independent, i.e. k 2 a static Love number), while their observed moments of inertia are close to 0.4 indicating a nearly homogeneous interior, the theoretical Love number k 2 of which would approach 1.5 if the body were fluid and compressible.…”
Section: Compositionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The presence of an iron core could even enhance the central condensation. Therefore, although the H/He layer is low in mass, it significantly strengthens the property of central condensation compared to a closer to zero-mass atmosphere planetary object such as the Earth, the theoretical k 2 value of which is ∼ 0.3 (Zhang 1991).…”
Section: (D)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Historically, Goldreich and Soter (1966) estimated that Q < 17 for Venus, Lago and Cazenave (1979) More recently, Venus' tidal Love number was estimated by Konopliv and Yoder (1996) using Magellan and Pioneer Venus Orbiter data to be k 2 = 0.295±0.066 implying the core is liquid (Yoder, 1997). Work by Zhang (1992) and Xia and Xiao (2002) has estimated k 2 = 0.18-0.26. A smaller value (k 2 = 0.17) would imply a solidified iron core, which is not consistent with Konopliv and Yoder (1996).…”
Section: 1029/2019je006276mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the equatorial deformation; see Appendix C. Here h 2 is the tidal Love number (h 2 ≈ 2k 2 [61]), while the other constants are as defined after (B.3). If we are interested only in orders of magnitude, we can express the equatorial deformation according to (B.4) with h 2 = 1 for the systems with Jupiter or Saturn as primary.…”
Section: B Parameters ε and γ For The Spin-orbit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%