2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcpy.1174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Love Leads to Action: Short‐Term Mating Mindset Mitigates the Status‐Quo Bias by Enhancing Promotion Focus

Abstract: We demonstrate that short-term mating (STM) mindsets lead individuals to a preference for action over inaction, thus violating the status-quo bias. We hypothesize, and provide supporting evidence through five experiments, that STM enhances one's promotion focus, which increases one's approaching tendencies and leads to the preference for actions against the status quo of affairs. This effect emerges independently of intrinsic product characteristics, such as the risk associated with gambling and investment dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…He and Cunha ( 2020 ) argued that individuals under a short-term mating state would make adaptations to collect information on or attract potential mating partners (for later scrutinizing if needed), and would prioritize finding the potential partners' strengths rather than fending off their weaknesses. Further, He and Cunha ( 2020 ) predicted that the short-term mating state would cause individuals to act instead of accepting their default or existing option.…”
Section: Three Consumer Mindsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…He and Cunha ( 2020 ) argued that individuals under a short-term mating state would make adaptations to collect information on or attract potential mating partners (for later scrutinizing if needed), and would prioritize finding the potential partners' strengths rather than fending off their weaknesses. Further, He and Cunha ( 2020 ) predicted that the short-term mating state would cause individuals to act instead of accepting their default or existing option.…”
Section: Three Consumer Mindsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He and Cunha ( 2020 ) argued that individuals under a short-term mating state would make adaptations to collect information on or attract potential mating partners (for later scrutinizing if needed), and would prioritize finding the potential partners' strengths rather than fending off their weaknesses. Further, He and Cunha ( 2020 ) predicted that the short-term mating state would cause individuals to act instead of accepting their default or existing option. It has been discovered that a short-term mating mindset could be activated among study participants who imagined a scenario about a blind date and answered questions on their dating related preferences, and that those under an activated short-term mating mindset could exhibit increased tendency toward choosing non-default over default options (He and Cunha, 2020 ).…”
Section: Three Consumer Mindsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A Figura 1 apresenta o modelamento gráfico no qual se traduzem as hipóteses formuladas neste capítulo: Figura 1-Modelamento gráfico do problema de pesquisa.FONTE: Autor 33 3 MÉTODO Os experimentos, portanto, apresentam-se como uma metodologia consistente para a avaliação dos efeitos de moderação de um construto em uma dada relação (HERNANDEZ; BASSO; BRANDÃO, 2014). O método experimental garante também controle de determinadas variáveis externas, tornando possível isolar claramente a relação causal estudada e eliminar possíveis efeitos oriundos de elementos cujo estudo ou efeitos não sejam focais em um dado experimento (CALDER; PHILLIPS; TYBOUT, 1981; FALK; HECKMAN, 2009).O método experimental é tido também como o melhor método para realização de pesquisas de marketing voltadas para a tomada de decisão(MALHOTRA et al, 2005), sendo frequentemente utilizado no campo de comportamento do consumidor e largamente adotado na pesquisa de construtos como foco regulatório e propensão ao risco (ALEXANDER;BLANK, 2018;CHOI et al, 2020;CROWE;HIGGINS, 1997;HIGGINS, 2002;HE;CUNHA, 2020;PENNINGTON;ROESE, 2003;ZOU;SCHOLER;HIGGINS, 2014). promoção x prevenção) x 2 (enquadramento em ganho x perda).…”
unclassified