Love Jihad and the Governance of Gender and Intimacy in Hindu Nationalist Statecraft

Abstract

What role does the Islamophobic theory of “love jihad” play in the politics of Hindu nationalist statecraft—the legal codification of Hindu nationalist ideology—in India today? In this article, we address this question through a critical analysis of how the idea of “love jihad” relate to both (a) a conservative politics of governing gender and intimacy in which women are constituted as subjects of protection and (b) an authoritarian populism grounded in a foundational opposition between true Indians and their anti-national enemies within. The article begins by exploring how “love jihad” has transformed from an idea that was used to legitimize extra-legal violence by Hindu nationalist vigilantes to the status of law, with a particular focus on the BJP-ruled state of Uttar Pradesh. We then situate the “love jihad” laws in relation to a regime of gender governance that constitutes women as subjects of protection - and specifically protection by state and nation—and discuss how this resonates with a pervasive patriarchal common sense in Indian society. Finally, we show how “love jihad” laws and the wider conservative politics of gender and intimacy within which it is embedded feeds into the authoritarian politics of the Modi regime, in which Muslims are consistently portrayed as enemies of the Indian nation, and reflect on what this entails for the country’s secular political order.

India’s Evolving Neoliberal Regime of Dispossession: From the Anti-SEZ Movement to the Farm Law Protests

“…The prioritisation of coercion over consent in relation to social movements must be understood in terms of how Modi’s ascent to national power has been achieved through the pursuit of a hegemonic project of authoritarian populism. This project is structured around Hindu nationalist logics, drawing a dividing line between the true Indian people (India’s Hindu majority) and their enemies within, a category largely made up of the Muslim minority and dissenting social and political forces (see Nielsen & Nilsen, 2021). What Modi’s BJP has to a great extent achieved, is to build consent around a project that marries this Hindu nationalism with neoliberal ideology.…”

Islamic Missiology: The Rise of ‘Procreative Jihad’ and Islamophobia in Nigeria

“…Most non-Muslims and Christians think that Jihad is synonymous with violence whenever it is addressed. According to experts, the word "jihad" originally meant "effort," "striving," or "combat" (Abdul-Salam, 2012; Nielsen & Nilsen, 2021). The latter might be done either in a peaceful manner using the tongue or the pen or by using force, as indicated in Quran 9:5 and 29.…”

Bovine meat, authoritarian populism, and state contradictions in Modi's India

“…Since 2014, when Modi came to power, bovines make almost daily headlines. On the one hand, and as part of a broader pattern of writing Hindu nationalism into law (Nielsen & Nilsen, 2021, 2022), ever‐stricter laws are passed to “protect the cow”; on the other hand, vigilante groups take it upon themselves to punish those who do not sufficiently respect the cow.…”

“…Such is its current standing that Walden Bello (2019, p. 68) calls it “the hegemonic force in Indian politics” today. This hegemonic configuration has turned increasingly to authoritarian populist discourse and measures, with a concomitant rise in social disorder and repression (Chacko, 2018; Nielsen & Nilsen, 2021). Key to our purposes, the ruling party's hegemonic project is centred on the twin ideological agendas of Hindu nationalism that seeks to turn India into a Hindu majoritarian state (Chatterji et al, 2019) and neoliberal economic policies that seek to create new spaces for capitalist accumulation (Palshikar, 2019).…”