2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782012000600009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loudness scattering due to vibro-acoustic model variability

Abstract: The use of numerical simulation in the design and evaluation of products performance is ever increasing. To a greater extent, such estimates are needed in an early design stage, when physical prototypes are not available. When dealing with vibro-acoustic models, known to be computationally expensive, a question remains, which is related to the accuracy of such models in view of the well-known variability inherent to the mass manufacturing production techniques. In addition, both the academia and industry have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to use any one-sided projection-based MOR method for second-order systems to generate a projection basis V as in (21) and then split and augment this basis to obtain Q V in (24). Alternatively, some MOR techniques exist that immediately produce a projection matrix which has the structure of Q V. Substructuring techniques such as component mode synthesis are a popular choice of MOR method for vibro-acoustic systems, often paired to a FE model in u p formulation [34,38,39]. The structural and acoustic domains are then considered as two separate 'components' of the full coupled system, and individual projection bases are constructed for each of these domains, which lead to a global projection matrix with the same structure as Q V. The insights gained in this section allow us to prove that these methods are in fact stability-preserving.…”
Section: P F S;r D V T S F S F A;r D V T a F A K C;r D V T S K C V Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to use any one-sided projection-based MOR method for second-order systems to generate a projection basis V as in (21) and then split and augment this basis to obtain Q V in (24). Alternatively, some MOR techniques exist that immediately produce a projection matrix which has the structure of Q V. Substructuring techniques such as component mode synthesis are a popular choice of MOR method for vibro-acoustic systems, often paired to a FE model in u p formulation [34,38,39]. The structural and acoustic domains are then considered as two separate 'components' of the full coupled system, and individual projection bases are constructed for each of these domains, which lead to a global projection matrix with the same structure as Q V. The insights gained in this section allow us to prove that these methods are in fact stability-preserving.…”
Section: P F S;r D V T S F S F A;r D V T a F A K C;r D V T S K C V Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the mock-up is airborne-sealed, plant variations due to changes in the acoustic domain are mostly avoided [81]. Hence, a single measurement of the acoustic control plant was carried out before each experimental run, just to account for long-term environmental changes (air temperature and humidity).…”
Section: Dynamics Of the Acoustic Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed mock-up, depicted in Fig. 1, represents the structural transfer paths on a vehicle, as noise and vibration issues in this industry are critical for product development and often stimulate research for analysis and control techniques [8][9][10][11]. The top assembly represents the powertrain, connected to the chassis via three mounts, that can vary in flexibility, and capable of transmitting vibration to the full system via the inertial shaker which is considered part of the active system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%