2007
DOI: 10.1121/1.2749414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: Model and data from cochlear implant listeners

Abstract: Most cochlear implant strategies utilize monopolar stimulation, likely inducing relatively broad activation of the auditory neurons. The spread of activity may be narrowed with a tripolar stimulation scheme, wherein compensating current of opposite polarity is simultaneously delivered to two adjacent electrodes. In this study, a model and cochlear implant subjects were used to examine loudness growth for varying amounts of tripolar compensation, parameterized by a coefficient sigma, ranging from 0 (monopolar) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
151
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When α was 0 or 1, relatively high ECAP amplitudes were sometimes observed around the single return electrode (i.e., EL7 for α = 0 and EL9 for α = 1), although it was unlikely to have side-lobe effects (e.g., Litvak et al 2007) with the small σ values used for ECAP recording. Further away from the main and return electrodes, the ECAP amplitudes were instead lower on the side of the single return electrode than on the other side.…”
Section: Current Steering With Steered Ptp Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When α was 0 or 1, relatively high ECAP amplitudes were sometimes observed around the single return electrode (i.e., EL7 for α = 0 and EL9 for α = 1), although it was unlikely to have side-lobe effects (e.g., Litvak et al 2007) with the small σ values used for ECAP recording. Further away from the main and return electrodes, the ECAP amplitudes were instead lower on the side of the single return electrode than on the other side.…”
Section: Current Steering With Steered Ptp Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative amount of intracochlear return current (defined as the compensation coefficient σ) ranges from 0 to 1. In human CI users, partial TP (pTP) stimulation with σ G 1 is often needed instead of full TP stimulation with σ =1 to achieve full loudness growth within the compliance limit while keeping relatively focused excitation patterns (e.g., Mens and Berenstein 2005;Litvak et al 2007). Compared to the traditional MPmode CI processing strategy, a pTP-mode strategy has been shown to significantly improve speech recognition in noise for CI users (Srinivasan et al 2013), when both strategies were matched in the channel number and stimulation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest models assume that the conductivity of cochlear tissues is uniform, and that current sources (i.e., the stimulating electrodes) are point sources within this homogeneous medium [e.g. (Litvak et al, 2007a)]. In response to stimulation from a single electrode, homogenous models predict isopotential contours that are spherical in shape (Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, loudness-balanced pTP stimuli with different α were assumed to activate the same number of neurons, as in Goldwyn et al (2010) and Litvak et al (2007). Although there was no evidence that a chosen neuron count corresponded to a particular value on a loudness perception scale, the current levels that activated 100 and 1,000 neurons were assumed to be around the perceptual threshold and most comfortable level, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A computational model that simulates intra-cochlear potential fields and auditory neural response to CI stimulation (Goldwyn et al 2010) was used to investigate loudness and pitch perception with steered pTP mode. Similar models have been used to study loudness growth with standard pTP stimulation (Litvak et al 2007) and simulate current focusing and steering in various modes (Bonham and Litvak 2008). Modeling studies were less time-consuming than testing human CI subjects and could provide valuable insights into human perceptual data, thanks to their capability of adjusting specific CI factors and examining conditions that were difficult to test in real CI users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%