Formal Description Techniques, IV 1992
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-89402-1.50027-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LOTOS-like process algebras with urgent or timed interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AORTA is a timed process algebra-based design language, so comparison might be made with other timed process algebras; however so many timed process algebras have been defined that even a cursory list of references would be too long for the scope of this paper, so the reader is referred elsewhere [9], and direct references given only for (a version of) Timed CCS [26], Timed CSP [22], and (a version of) Timed LOTOS [2]. At this level the main distinctive feature of AORTA is the ability to generate implementations about which timing guarantees can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AORTA is a timed process algebra-based design language, so comparison might be made with other timed process algebras; however so many timed process algebras have been defined that even a cursory list of references would be too long for the scope of this paper, so the reader is referred elsewhere [9], and direct references given only for (a version of) Timed CCS [26], Timed CSP [22], and (a version of) Timed LOTOS [2]. At this level the main distinctive feature of AORTA is the ability to generate implementations about which timing guarantees can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOSCA provides a formalism combining CCS, VDM and time, but without providing implementation techniques [25] whilst RAISE [24] and LOTOS [20,27] provide data modelling in concurrent systems, with some implementation techniques, but no time. Work has also been done with timed extensions to LOTOS [2], which already has the data language ACT-ONE included, but in this case no implementation techniques are provided. A different kind of approach involves introducing time into data specification languages such as Z [10, 13,14], with the closest work to ours being that by Fidge et al [12], which allows the timed refinement of concurrent systems, including reasoning about implementations by embedding scheduling theory into the Z model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those with deterministic delays, we mention timed CSP [35], temporal CCS [29], timed CCS [39], real-time ACP [2], urgent LOTOS [10], CIPA [1], TPL [20], ATP [32], TIC [34], and PAFAS [14]. As observed in [31,38,12], these calculi differ on the basis of a number of time-related options, some of which are recalled below:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In S , there are five parameter variables p 1 , p 2 , ..., p 5 which denote the computation times for executing events c, d, b, f, g, respectively. In our model, in order to reduce the size of the tuple machine, we assume that each event has urgency property [2]. That is, if each event becomes executable, then we assume that the event is immediately executed.…”
Section: Parametric Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%