The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1994
DOI: 10.1038/sj/jors/0451211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lot Streaming in a Two-stage Flow Shop with Set-up, Processing and Removal Times Separated

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the wellknown flowshop scheduling problem is a special case of the above problem, when splitting is not allowed (a single sublot of each lot). Cetinkaya [5] and Vickson [28] show that optimal sequencing of the products and splitting of each product into optimal sublots under a specified number of sublots with no intermingling could be performed separately. The optimal sequence is obtained using Johnson's rule.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the wellknown flowshop scheduling problem is a special case of the above problem, when splitting is not allowed (a single sublot of each lot). Cetinkaya [5] and Vickson [28] show that optimal sequencing of the products and splitting of each product into optimal sublots under a specified number of sublots with no intermingling could be performed separately. The optimal sequence is obtained using Johnson's rule.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total number of items -{8, 16, 24, 32, 40}. Major setup - (2,5). The ratio of the setup time and the process time.…”
Section: Problem Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was showed that it is not possible to solve the n-job problem simply by applying lot streaming individually to the single-job problem (Potts & Baker, 1989). Several papers independently show that this problem it is decomposed into an easily identifiable sequence of single job problems, using continuous values, even with setup times (Vickson, 1995) and transfer times (Cetinkaya, 1994). Other authors have widely tackled the same problem using discrete values (2/N/C/II/DV) considering setup times (Ganapathy, Marimuthu & Ponnambalam, 2004;Marimuthu & Ponnambalam, 2005;Marimuthu, Ponnambalam & Suresh, 2004).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was -763-Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management -http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.553 presented some closed form solutions for continuous sublots and a fast polynominally bounded search algorithm for discrete sublots. Other papers proposed the use of removal times (Cetinkaya, 1994), of no-wait condition (Sriskandarajah & Wagneur, 1999) or even allowing interleaving (Cetinkaya, 2006).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%