2015
DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost without each other: The influence of group identity loss on the self-concept.

Abstract: Individuals' social relationships influence their self-concepts. Both dyadic and group relationships alter the self during the relationship, and dyadic relationships alter the self when they end. The current research investigated whether collective relationships would do the same across 3 studies. In Study 1, participants imagined losing or retaining group membership. Imagining group membership loss predicted reduced self-concept clarity, with greater group identification resulting in greater reductions. In St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the impact of career loss, some research has demonstrated that imagining the loss of a possible group identity can diminish self-esteem as well as self-clarity (Slotter, Winger, & Soto, 2015). In this work, students first reported the importance of their university (group) identity.…”
Section: Part 2: From Possible-self Revision To Core-self Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the impact of career loss, some research has demonstrated that imagining the loss of a possible group identity can diminish self-esteem as well as self-clarity (Slotter, Winger, & Soto, 2015). In this work, students first reported the importance of their university (group) identity.…”
Section: Part 2: From Possible-self Revision To Core-self Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear example of this is when people lose a part of their physical self, such as a limb, but the same sense of loss can also occur when people lose their possessions to a natural disaster, their loved ones to death, their spouse to a divorce, or their career goals to an injury (Belk, 1988;Burris & Rempel, 2004). When a strongly fused object or person is lost, one's self-concept is forever changed, and the self is disrupted (Lewandowski et al, 2006;Slotter et al, 2014;Slotter, Gardner, & Finkel, 2010;Slotter, Winger, & Soto, 2015). In fact, this disruption of self after the loss of a fused component is capitalized on by institutions to depersonalize or dehumanize.…”
Section: Positive Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most constructs in psychology, fusion is often assessed using pictorial, rather than verbal, measures (e.g., see Aron et al, 1992;Schubert & Otten, 2002;Swann Jr. et al, 2009). While uncommon, verbal measures have been used to assess identification with other constructs, for example, Slotter et al (2015) used the Group Identification Scale (Cameron, 2004), a 12-item scale with questions such as "Being a(n) (ingroup member) is an important reflection of who I am" and "In general, being a(n) (ingroup member) is an important part of my self-image." These measures are effective; however, they are mainly used in conjunction with pictorial measures of fusion.…”
Section: Measuring Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interaction is deadly for a group, unless you quickly resolve the issue and put the group back on the path to cohesive cooperation and supportive interaction (Slotter et al 2015). A person with high anxiety may also withdraw from the group-sit shyly or not talk.…”
Section: Make Choices Relevantmentioning
confidence: 99%