2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10912-007-9050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in Translation: Bibliotherapy and Evidence-based Medicine

Abstract: Evidence-based medicine's (EBM) quantitative methodologies reflect medical science's long-standing mistrust of the imprecision and subjectivity of ordinary descriptive language. However, EBM's attempts to replace subjectivity with precise empirical methods are problematic when clinicians must negotiate between scientific medicine and patients' experience. This problem is evident in the case of bibliotherapy (patient reading as treatment modality), a practice widespread despite its reliance on anecdotal evidenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medical practice is dominated by evidence-based medicine but decisions about whom or when to treat or how to prevent the disease, cannot be made based on science alone [9]. It is necessary to consider medicine as a profoundly human enterprise and to learn a set of skills and knowledge to land on a suitable decisionmaking process when moral conflicts arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical practice is dominated by evidence-based medicine but decisions about whom or when to treat or how to prevent the disease, cannot be made based on science alone [9]. It is necessary to consider medicine as a profoundly human enterprise and to learn a set of skills and knowledge to land on a suitable decisionmaking process when moral conflicts arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her narrative review "Lost in Translation: Bibliotherapy and Evidence-Based Medicine," Dysart-Gale stated that evidence-based medicine cannot evaluate bibliotherapy because it is based on the practice of quantifying subjective language and experience [114], Timm and Jones reviewed reports of government-sponsored programs in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries in the first five years of the twenty-first century [1]. In "Information Rx: Prescribing Good Consumerism and Responsible Citizenship," Adams and de Bont pre sented European web-based information prescription programs from both governmental and nongovern mental organizations as "supporting conventional understanding of social norms, such as the role of the medical expert as a primary leader" who encourages patients to be "informed and reflexive consumers" [115], Huber, Shapiro, and Gillaspy presented a similar analysis from the United States, "Top down versus Bottom up: The Social Construc tion of the Health Literacy Movement," in which information prescription programs had only "limited success."…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980s and early 1990s, bibliotherapy was a widely used but poorly researched therapeutic modality (Dysart-Gale, 2008). However, numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have documented the positive effects of bibliotherapy for clinical conditions such as deliberate self-harm (Evans et al, 1999), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Lovell, Ekers, Fulford, Baguley, & Bradshaw, 2004) and bulimia nervosa (Ghaderi, & Scott, 2003) and insomnia (Morin, Mineault, & Gagne, 1999).…”
Section: Bibliotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%