2018
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1545578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lost in the crowd: identifying targetable MHC class I neoepitopes for cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strategy to improve the ability to predict neoepitope was the integration of potential immunogenicity assessments to the prediction process. MuPeXI algorithm ranks predicted neoepitopes by a priority score that is based on inferred abundance, MHC binding affinity, and an immunogenicity score based on similarity to non-mutated wild-type peptide [60] EpitopeHunter algorithm, which integrates RNA expression with immunogenicity prediction algorithm based on the hydrophobicity of the TCR contact region [61, 62]. Neopepsee algorithm using a machine learning algorithm trained on epitope features, including antigen processing and presentation, amino acid characteristics, the binding difference between wild-type and mutant epitope, and similarity to known epitopes, to predict the immunogenicity and reduce the false-positive rate [63].…”
Section: Prediction and Identification Of Tumor-specific Neoantigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy to improve the ability to predict neoepitope was the integration of potential immunogenicity assessments to the prediction process. MuPeXI algorithm ranks predicted neoepitopes by a priority score that is based on inferred abundance, MHC binding affinity, and an immunogenicity score based on similarity to non-mutated wild-type peptide [60] EpitopeHunter algorithm, which integrates RNA expression with immunogenicity prediction algorithm based on the hydrophobicity of the TCR contact region [61, 62]. Neopepsee algorithm using a machine learning algorithm trained on epitope features, including antigen processing and presentation, amino acid characteristics, the binding difference between wild-type and mutant epitope, and similarity to known epitopes, to predict the immunogenicity and reduce the false-positive rate [63].…”
Section: Prediction and Identification Of Tumor-specific Neoantigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a promising opportunity to target cancer specific epitopes (neoepitopes), and to generate adoptive T cell therapies and personalized cancer vaccines. However, poor antigen presentation and weak immunogenicity in tumor cells are primary causes of resistance to these therapies (Pu, Wu, Su, Mao, & Fang, ; Wilson & Anderson, ). RIG‐I like receptors and Toll‐like receptors are the main pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in the regulation of Type I IFNs (Peng, Xu, & Zheng, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more comprehensive technologies, including NGS, TCR sequencing and HPLC-MS are required. Furthermore, current methods for predicting tumor neo-Ags remain at an early stage and are limited by class I rather than class II MHC antigens (92). Additional efforts are required in the development of MHC class I- and class II-restricted neo-Ags as these will provide additional information about the immune surveillance in tumor development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%