Lost (and found?) in translation: key terminology in disaster studies

Abstract

PurposeDisaster studies has emerged as an international interdisciplinary body of knowledge; however, similar to other academic disciplines, its terminology is predominantly anglophone. This paper explores the implications of translating disaster studies terminology, most often theorised in English, into other languages and back.Design/methodology/approachThe authors chose six of the most commonly used (as well as debated and contested) terms that are prominent in academic, policy and public discourses: resilience, vulnerability, capacity, disaster, hazard and risk. These words were translated into 54 languages and the meanings were articulated descriptively in cases where the translation did not have exactly the same meaning as the word in English. The authors then analysed these meanings in order to understand implications of disaster scholars working between dominant and “peripheral” languages.FindingsFindings of the study demonstrate that many of the terms so casually used in disaster studies in English do not translate easily – or at all – opening the concepts that are encoded in these terms for further interpretation. Moreover, the terms used in disaster studies are not only conceptualised in English but are also tied to an anglophone approach to research. It is important to consider the intertwined implications that the use of the terminology carries, including the creation of a “separate” language, power vs communication and linguistic imperialism.Originality/valueUnderstanding of the meaning (and contestation of meaning) of these terms in English provides an insight into the power relationships between English and the other language. Given the need to translate key concepts from English into other languages, it is important to appreciate their cultural and ideological “baggage”.

Detecting Natural Hazard-Related Disaster Impacts with Social Media Analytics: The Case of Australian States and Territories

“…Climate change-induced natural hazard-related disasters have become frequent events of our time sparing no corners of the world [97]. They are so common and disruptive that even disaster terminology has been subject to change over the last decade [98][99][100]. These more severe and frequent disasters are causing catastrophic results for many urban centers around the globe [101].…”

Integrating international linguistic minorities in emergency planning at institutions of higher education

“…International linguistic minorities may not be able to fully comprehend the disaster terminology used in emergency communication (Chmutina et al 2020 ). The terms used in UF emergency communication is the same one used in local weather channels, so the domestic groups find it easy to understand; however, the linguistic minorities find it challenging (He et al 2007 ).…”

Considerations for creating equitable and inclusive communication campaigns associated with ShakeAlert, the earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the USA

“…In the USA, there are over 350 languages spoken, with a large diversity of languages spoken on the West Coast where ShakeAlert is operating (U.S. Census, 2015). Terms developed by researchers and scientists may not be easily translatable into other languages (Chmutina et al, 2020), and social norms around protective actions may differ significantly for diverse ethnic groups (McBride et al, 2019). Overall, considerations of race, ethnicity and language are critical to creating equitable and inclusive campaigns and warnings (Phillips and Morrow, 2007).…”