2012
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2012.2190767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lossless Migrations of Link-State IGPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VII, we discuss related work. Our results generalize and extend previous contributions on safe coexistence of multiple IGP instances (e.g., [12]), hybrid SDN networks (e.g., [7]) and safe reconfigurations (e.g., [4]). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…VII, we discuss related work. Our results generalize and extend previous contributions on safe coexistence of multiple IGP instances (e.g., [12]), hybrid SDN networks (e.g., [7]) and safe reconfigurations (e.g., [4]). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Live reconfigurations are crucial to adapt to network dynamics, ensure high performance under changing traffic conditions, and improve network flexibility and evolvability [4], [17]. A commonly-used reconfiguration framework, called "Ships in the Night" (SITN) [6], [18], [5], [4], is based on running multiple independent control-planes on the same network.…”
Section: B Graceful Reconfigurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two examples are represented by safe network updates and declarative networking. In the first case, safe update techniques tailored to either CN (e.g., [23]) or SDN (e.g., [9]) networks will have to be extended, or new techniques to be proposed. Indeed, while complicating the problem, the presence of paradigm interaction mechanisms may not prevent provably-safe update procedures to be devised [24].…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%