2015
DOI: 10.1364/ol.40.000375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lossless fractional repetition-rate multiplication of optical pulse trains

Abstract: We propose and experimentally demonstrate repetition-rate multiplication of picosecond optical pulse trains by a fractional factor based on temporal self-imaging, involving temporal phase modulation and first-order dispersion. Multiplication factors of 1.25, 1.33, 1.5, 1.6, 1.75, 2.25, 2.33, and 2.5 are achieved with high fidelity from a mode-locked laser with an input repetition-rate between 10 and 20 GHz.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, an important set of these techniques is based on the theory of Talbot self‐imaging . Such methods have been developed to achieve multiplication and/or division of the repetition period of pulse trains by arbitrary (integer or fractional) factors, as well as arbitrary control of the FSR of frequency combs .…”
Section: Control Of the Periodicity Of Repetitive Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, an important set of these techniques is based on the theory of Talbot self‐imaging . Such methods have been developed to achieve multiplication and/or division of the repetition period of pulse trains by arbitrary (integer or fractional) factors, as well as arbitrary control of the FSR of frequency combs .…”
Section: Control Of the Periodicity Of Repetitive Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology outlined here allows for arbitrary control of the repetition period of a pulse train, where the FSR of its frequency comb representation is related to the achieved pulse period (the obtained FSR is the exact inverse of the obtained pulse period). Pulse period control techniques proposed to date based on this methodology only deal with temporal period control; consequently, they end with step 3 (Figure (a.3)) for fractional pulse period multiplication/division, or step 2 (Figure (a.2)) for integer pulse period multiplication (see Section ) . Step 4 (TPM 2 , Figure (a.4)) is only necessary if one wishes to obtain an output pulse train free of pulse‐to‐pulse phase variations and/or to control the comb FSR accordingly.…”
Section: Phase‐controlled Talbot Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations