2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21257-4_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lossless Compression of Polar Iris Image Data

Abstract: Abstract. The impact of using different lossless compression algorithms when compressing biometric iris sample data from several public iris databases is investigated. In particular, the application of dedicated lossless image codecs (lossless JPEG, JPEG-LS, PNG, and GIF), lossless variants of lossy codecs (JPEG2000, JPEG XR, and SPIHT), and a few general purpose file compression schemes is compared. We specifically focus on polar iris images (as a result after iris detection, iris extraction, and mapping to p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• JPEG XR FuturixImager6 applied this most current ISO still image coding standard based on the Microsoft H.D. format [25]. Table 6 shows the C.R.…”
Section: Setting and Compression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• JPEG XR FuturixImager6 applied this most current ISO still image coding standard based on the Microsoft H.D. format [25]. Table 6 shows the C.R.…”
Section: Setting and Compression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ives et al [ 6 ] investigated the effects of image compression on recognition system performance using a commercial version of the Daugman “iris2pi” algorithm along with JPEG-2000 compression, and linked that to image quality. Korvath et al [ 7 ] evaluated the impact of dedicated lossless image codecs (lossless JPEG, JPEG-LS, PNG, and GIF), lossless variants of lossy codecs (JPEG2000, JPEG XR, and SPIHT), and some general purpose file compression schemes on the iris images. Bergmüller et al [ 8 ] studied the impact of using pre-compressed data in iris segmentation and evaluated the relation between iris segmentation performance and general image quality metrics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%