2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of zebrafish Smyd1a interferes with myofibrillar integrity without triggering the misfolded myosin response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that, in contrast to smyd1b mutation, loss of smyd1a did not up-regulate hsp90-a1 gene expression. This is consistent with previous findings showing that loss of smyd1a did not trigger misfolded myosin response in zebrafish (26). Smyd1a and Smyd1b are required for slow muscle development Previous studies using MO knockdown and zebrafish mutant showed contradictory findings regarding Smyd1 function in the slow muscle of zebrafish embryos (7)(8)(9)13).…”
Section: Smyd1a Mutation Alone Resulted In No Visible Muscle Defect I...supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We showed that, in contrast to smyd1b mutation, loss of smyd1a did not up-regulate hsp90-a1 gene expression. This is consistent with previous findings showing that loss of smyd1a did not trigger misfolded myosin response in zebrafish (26). Smyd1a and Smyd1b are required for slow muscle development Previous studies using MO knockdown and zebrafish mutant showed contradictory findings regarding Smyd1 function in the slow muscle of zebrafish embryos (7)(8)(9)13).…”
Section: Smyd1a Mutation Alone Resulted In No Visible Muscle Defect I...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, using the zebrafish smyd1b mutant, flatline ( Fla mvo47a ), it was reported that Smyd1b function was restricted to fast muscles and that the loss of Smyd1b had no effect on slow muscle development (8). Smyd1a function also remains controversial based on 2 morpholino (MO) knockdown studies (11, 26). We have shown that knockdown of smyd1a had no visible effect on muscle development in zebrafish embryos (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crispants) are often genetically mosaics. However, in cases of highly efficient gRNAs, they have been shown to recapitulate mutant phenotypes successfully (Küry et al , ; Teboul et al , ; Paone et al , ). Both psmc3 crispants used in this study displayed a cataract phenotype (100% of gRNA1 + Cas9 ( n = 20) and 95% of gRNA2 + Cas9 ( n = 20), whereas none of the control embryos (injected with gRNA1 ( n = 20) or gRNA2 ( n = 10) without the Cas9 protein) showed abnormal lens reflections (Fig B and B′, and ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this specific feature, gene functional redundancy needs to be taken under consideration during zebrafish modeling design. A recent reported example is the redundant roles of zebrafish smyd1a and smyd1b paralogues [23]. At this study, it was shown that both Smyd1a and Smyd1b were localized in skeletal and cardiac muscles and overexpression of smyd1a efficiently compensated the loss of Smyd1b in mutant zebrafish and rescued the provoked myopathic phenotype.…”
Section: The Pool Of Engineering Toolsmentioning
confidence: 65%