2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of the LAT Adaptor Converts Antigen-Responsive T Cells into Pathogenic Effectors that Function Independently of the T Cell Receptor

Abstract: Despite compromised T cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling, mice in which tyrosine 136 of the adaptor linker for activation of T cells (LAT) was constitutively mutated (Lat(Y136F) mice) accumulate CD4(+) T cells that trigger autoimmunity and inflammation. Here we show that equipping postthymic CD4(+) T cells with LATY136F molecules or rendering them deficient in LAT molecules triggers a lymphoproliferative disorder dependent on prior TCR engagement. Therefore, such disorders required neither faulty thymic T c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
121
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
13
121
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Raf and MEK1 have been shown to mediate ERK activation by Cdc42 (43, 44), we did not find significant alterations in Raf and MEK1 activities in Cdc42 −/− T cells, suggesting that Cdc42 inhibition of ERK activation is independent of Raf and MEK1. In addition to the impact on JNK, Cdc42 also may suppress ERK activation through other mechanisms: (i) by upregulation of negative regulators of T-cell activation such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), IκB, and suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (Socs1) (45) and/or (ii) by activating LAT adaptor, removal of which recently was shown to cause a lymphoproliferative phenotype (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Raf and MEK1 have been shown to mediate ERK activation by Cdc42 (43, 44), we did not find significant alterations in Raf and MEK1 activities in Cdc42 −/− T cells, suggesting that Cdc42 inhibition of ERK activation is independent of Raf and MEK1. In addition to the impact on JNK, Cdc42 also may suppress ERK activation through other mechanisms: (i) by upregulation of negative regulators of T-cell activation such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), IκB, and suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (Socs1) (45) and/or (ii) by activating LAT adaptor, removal of which recently was shown to cause a lymphoproliferative phenotype (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LAT-deficient Jurkat cells, c-Cbl is hyperphosphorylated upon TCR stimulation (Finco et al 1998;Mingueneau et al 2009) and phosphorylated c-Cbl has been implicated in negative regulation of TCR signal transduction (Boussiotis et al 1997;Murphy et al 1998). In addition, consistent with its role as an E3-ubiquitin ligase in several signaling systems, c-Cbl has been implicated in ubiquitylation of the TCRz and CD3d chains of the TCR as well as the signaling proteins ZAP-70, LAT, PLC-g1, PI3K, Vav, and PKC-u in T cells (Weissman 2001;Duan et al 2004;Balagopalan et al 2007).…”
Section: Plc-g1 Binds Y132 Of Lat and Mediates Transcriptional Activamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altered signaling in LAT Y136F T cells consists of decreased TCR-induced calcium flux and other events downstream of PLC-g1 (Sommers et al 2002). Reports of Erk1/2 activation in LAT Y136F T cells have been variable (Sommers et al 2002;Mingueneau et al 2009;Miyaji et al 2009), most likely because of different methods of in vitro activation and age of the animals from which the T cells were derived. However, a report by Miyaji et al showed that Erk activation played an important role in lymphoproliferative disease in LAT Y136F mice (Miyaji et al 2009).…”
Section: In Vivo Functions Of Lat Phosphotyrosines and Cysteinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8B, are responsible for the induction of colitis when transferred in the absence of Treg cells. Antigenic peptides derived from the enteric bacteria and presented by MHCII molecules have been shown to be responsible for this TCR-driven fast proliferation whereas the slow proliferation is independent of MHCII molecules and IL-7-driven [26][27][28][29][30]. We took advantage of this model to determine whether upon transfer into Cd3e 5/ 5 x MHCII / mice, MLN-resident inflammatory M s isolated from MHCII-sufficient, colitic mice were capable of rescuing the fast proliferation of cotransferred CD4 + T cells and their differentiation into IFN-γ-producing effectors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%