2020
DOI: 10.1113/jp279068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of presynaptic inhibition for step initiation in parkinsonian individuals with freezing of gait

Abstract: Key pointsr Individuals with freezing of gait (FoG) due to Parkinson's disease (PD) have small and long anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) associated with delayed step initiation.r Individuals with FoG ('freezers') may require functional reorganization of spinal mechanisms to perform APAs due to supraspinal dysfunction. As presynaptic inhibition (PSI) is centrally modulated to allow execution of supraspinal motor commands, it may be deficient in freezers during APAs.r We show that freezers presented PSI … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,11,22 The ARTI program incorporates complex motor exercises with dual-task conditions, which require high attentional, motor control, and sensorimotor demands. These primary characteristics of ARTI are very important to restore gait automaticity in freezers because they present an inadequate integration of sensory inputs and proprioceptive deficits, 52 as external somatosensory cues can mitigate freezing events while walking 53 as well as DTC on gait speed and stride length. 54 Second, freezers present worse attentional control to perform dual-task walking than nonfreezers, as gait attentiondirected cues (visual external information) improve dual-task walking.…”
Section: Arti Restores Gait Automaticity In Freezersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,11,22 The ARTI program incorporates complex motor exercises with dual-task conditions, which require high attentional, motor control, and sensorimotor demands. These primary characteristics of ARTI are very important to restore gait automaticity in freezers because they present an inadequate integration of sensory inputs and proprioceptive deficits, 52 as external somatosensory cues can mitigate freezing events while walking 53 as well as DTC on gait speed and stride length. 54 Second, freezers present worse attentional control to perform dual-task walking than nonfreezers, as gait attentiondirected cues (visual external information) improve dual-task walking.…”
Section: Arti Restores Gait Automaticity In Freezersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Individuals with FOG (freezers) show delayed step initiation associated with repetitive anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) as if they cannot inhibit their postural preparation and release their stepping motor program. 6 In fact, FOG has been associated with small and prolonged APAs during step initiation 7 and deficits in cognitive inhibition. 5 Thus, we hypothesize that improving APAs and cognitive inhibition could contribute to decreased FOG severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 No study has investigated the effects of exercise intervention on MLR activation and gait initiation (APAs) in freezers. Thus, as abnormal APAs and dysfunction in cognitive inhibition are associated with FOG 5,7 and linked to impairments in MLR, we hypothesized that exercise interventions aiming to improve these aspects could increase MLR activation and decrease FOG severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactive and dynamic postural control have been identified as the most affected postural control systems in FOG [ 34 , 35 ], specifically weight-shifting impairments and inadequate scaling and timing of postural responses, especially when occurring under time constraints [ 36 ]. This appears to be related to loss of presynaptic inhibition for step initiation [ 37 ]. Other than balance-gait impairment, bradykinesia was also strongly correlated with FOG in our study, most other studies similarly supporting the relationship of more severe motor disability with an increased risk of FOG [ 4 , 5 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%