2001
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans: Mechanisms, consequences, and implications for hominid evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the acquisition of genes encoding syncytins, proteins derived from the envelope protein of endogenous retroviral elements, enabled mammals to develop placenta and fetal-maternal tolerance and thereby fundamentally influenced the emergence of the entire Mammalia class [53,54]. Furthermore, loss of defensins could force our ancestors to develop alternative anti-viral strategies, some of which (such as inactivation of a gene responsible for synthesis of N-glycolylneuraminic acid, a common receptor for many pathogens) could beneficially affect brain development [55,56]. If the later scenarios are correct, than re-introduction of θ -defensins to the human population (either at the genetic or at the pharmaceutical levels) might bring all the benefits of increased resistance to viral and bacterial pathogens without negative side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the acquisition of genes encoding syncytins, proteins derived from the envelope protein of endogenous retroviral elements, enabled mammals to develop placenta and fetal-maternal tolerance and thereby fundamentally influenced the emergence of the entire Mammalia class [53,54]. Furthermore, loss of defensins could force our ancestors to develop alternative anti-viral strategies, some of which (such as inactivation of a gene responsible for synthesis of N-glycolylneuraminic acid, a common receptor for many pathogens) could beneficially affect brain development [55,56]. If the later scenarios are correct, than re-introduction of θ -defensins to the human population (either at the genetic or at the pharmaceutical levels) might bring all the benefits of increased resistance to viral and bacterial pathogens without negative side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of this sugar is due to a mutation in the enzyme cytidine monophosphate-NeuAc hydroxylase that occurred in the hominid lineage subsequent to its divergence from the lineage of the great ape about 3 million y ago (53). There is evidence that the lack of production of NeuGc may be involved in resistance to infection by certain microbial pathogens, that immune system receptors that recognize sialic acid residues may be differentially modulated by NeuGc compared with NeuAc, and that dietary sources of NeuGc may lead to its accumulation and immune recognition in certain inflammatory conditions (53). Although there are no clear associations between the consumption of NeuGc and disease risk or incidence, it may be beneficial to reduce NeuGc-containing oligosaccharides in certain sensitive populations.…”
Section: Bmomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another example, the human-specific inactivation of the gene encoding the enzyme CMP- N -acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) led to the deficiency of the mammalian common sialic acid Neu5Gc ( N -glycolylneuraminic acid) on the human cell surface [19]. This inactivation was due to an Alu-mediated sequence replacement [26] that occurred about 2.7 million years ago [27] and may have had several important consequences to human biology and evolution [28]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%