2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11665-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of Microbiome Ecological Niches and Diversity by Global Change and Trophic Downgrading

Abstract: Global change that include, but is not limited to these: habitat loss and disturbance, greenhouse gas emissions, rising climate warming and CO 2 ,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, the role played by macroorganisms in the control of microbial diversity has been largely ignored in the literature ( Mihaljevic, 2012 ; Saleem, 2015 ; Li et al, 2016 ); the interactions between hosts and their microbiota being mostly considered in the light of the potential effect, beneficial or deleterious, for the macroorganism’s life ( Harris, 1993 ; Mao-Jones et al, 2010 ; Nayak, 2010b ; Clements et al, 2014 ). Such a one-sided and asymmetric view of macroorganism–microbe interactions is exemplified by studies on fish and their intestinal microbial communities which generally focus on the benefits for the fish ( Nayak, 2010a , b ; Clements et al, 2014 ) or in a more limited way, how the fish gut microbiota support hosts’ functional roles ( Smriga et al, 2010 ; Mouchet et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Review Of the Main Processes Regulating Marine Microbial DIVmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until recently, the role played by macroorganisms in the control of microbial diversity has been largely ignored in the literature ( Mihaljevic, 2012 ; Saleem, 2015 ; Li et al, 2016 ); the interactions between hosts and their microbiota being mostly considered in the light of the potential effect, beneficial or deleterious, for the macroorganism’s life ( Harris, 1993 ; Mao-Jones et al, 2010 ; Nayak, 2010b ; Clements et al, 2014 ). Such a one-sided and asymmetric view of macroorganism–microbe interactions is exemplified by studies on fish and their intestinal microbial communities which generally focus on the benefits for the fish ( Nayak, 2010a , b ; Clements et al, 2014 ) or in a more limited way, how the fish gut microbiota support hosts’ functional roles ( Smriga et al, 2010 ; Mouchet et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Review Of the Main Processes Regulating Marine Microbial DIVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such scenario, the observed biodiversity erosion of macroorganisms in marine ecosystems (i.e., defaunation; Estes et al, 2011 ; Mora et al, 2011 ; McCauley et al, 2015 ) may ultimately impact on the spatio-temporal dynamics of microbial metacommunities and the ecosystem processes they sustain. These considerations need further attention notably as it was recently stated that “ nothing is known about how the aquatic ecosystem trophic downgrading is linked to the microbiome diversity loss and associated ecosystem services ” ( Saleem, 2015 ).…”
Section: Sustaining the Rarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of extremely long transients close to bifurcations (as shown in this article) opens the possibility that some ecosystems may be currently living in a ghost state, transitioning towards a less complex state [76,77,101] due to impact of human activity including deforestation, environmental contamination or defaunation. Anthropogenic impacts are making ecosystems to experience defaunation [102,103], suffering extinction cascades due to trophic downgrading or ecological meltdown caused by ecosystem domestication (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, facilitative interactions are key for survival of the less adapted plants even in extreme environments (Berdugo et al 2018), which makes plant-plant interaction networks nested on key species whose loss may produce cascading extinctions (Thébault et al 2007;Dunne & Williams 2009;Rocha et al 2018). These cascading effects can even act through trophic levels, involving groups other than plants (Jones et al 1996;Wright et al 2004;Cuddington et al 2011) and even affect microbial diversity (Saleem 2015). Thus it is important to understand species-species interactions in these communities, especially their strength and hierarchy, and studies aimed at understanding community interactions through networks in extreme environments are still insufficient and usually not assessing physiological limits of plants (something key in these very high aridity levels).…”
Section: B Biodiversity Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%